Search for: "Light v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 12,832
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
And tomorrow, Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
(2) Is the Presidency an "office ... under the United States? [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm
The Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Groff v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
In this post I’ll simply flag a couple of points that haven’t been sufficiently emphasized yet, or that warrant particular additional attention in light of the CRSCC’s arguments: Chase’s Argument was Focused on Judicial Removal of Officials Already in Office. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 9:18 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 10:06 am
State Parkway Condo. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
United States and, most recently, in U.S. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
Cir. 2012) (quoting United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 10:01 am
On June 8, 2023, the United States Supreme Court decided on Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
” In the 2012 touchstone decision Arizona v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
The ramifications of this decision could be significant, as the SEC often uses its in-house courts to seek monetary penalties, and studies reveal that the SEC wins cases it brings in its in-house courts at a much higher rate than those it tries in federal court.[6] We also should expect plaintiffs to attempt to maneuver in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Slack Technologies LLC v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm
Pereira before him, had lived in the United States for less than 10 years when he was served with an NTA. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
United States, for instance, the U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:07 am
Gonzales , 435 F.3d 172 (2d Cir 2006) , and held that the one-year period in which a timely application for asylum may be made runs from the applicant’s literal “last arrival” even when that last arrival followed a relatively brief trip outside the United States pursuant to advance parole granted by immigration authorities (which the Second Circuit had held would not restart the one-year clock). [read post]
