Search for: "Lite v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 312
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2015, 11:55 am
Caplan v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 12:36 pm
We first happened upon Loreto v. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 5:35 am
In the case of Graham v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 10:52 am
The Conseil d'Etat has referred various questions about this to the CJEU.Online state surveillance The UK’s Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (IP Act), partially implemented in 2016 and 2017, is expected to come fully in force in 2018. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 4:20 am
The United States Olympic Committee v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
Justice Richter found that the Supreme Court ignored its own custody schedule when it stated that the parents here shared “very nearly equal” physical custody of the child. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:04 am
In a separate order, the court adjudged defendant to be in contempt of the pendente lite order, but imposed no punishment. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 1:04 pm
It was in the case of Wilkerson v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 2:26 pm
This sum is based upon, inter alia, the Husband's current earnings and business, the parties' pre-divorce lifestyle, the Husband's required payment of pendente lite maintenance for four years, and the fact that the Wife is currently employed (see Graves v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 9:36 am
Arnold Schwarzenegger and Corrections Secretary Matt Cate "essentially have told the court that they will reduce the state prison population as the state sees fit, to a level the state deems appropriate, and in a time frame the state has set for itself," the attorneys wrote. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 6:18 am
Seltzer v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 1:39 pm
Groh v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
State just got mobbed. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:47 am
It covers all types of imports and exports of products.[2] Any national measure enacted by Member States which has the effect of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, trade in the internal market is to be considered as having an effect equivalent to quantitative restrictions.[3] The Court of Justice of the European Union [“CJEU”] has explained that national measures subjecting the internal trade of goods to prior authorization restrict access to the market… [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 8:42 am
In Deline v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 11:17 am
Additionally, under the current guidelines for child support, if the parties' monthly net income exceeded $20,000, the Court was instructed to apply the analysis as found in the Melzer v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 1:33 pm
As a result, in the 1982 case Edgar v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 1:33 pm
As a result, in the 1982 case Edgar v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 12:10 pm
Kennedy Sky Lites, Inc., 929 F.2d 676, 678 (Fed. [read post]
29 Sep 2012, 12:01 am
Evolution of Case Law under the 1993 Act:One of the earliest decisions on this issue is the case of Assam State Electricity Board v. [read post]
