Search for: "Little v. Washington State et al"
Results 181 - 200
of 215
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 2:49 am
It was considered at one point to be a factor which could preclude U.S.approval to Russia's ascension into the World Trade Organization. [16] For years, WTO negotiations between the U.S. and Russia were slowed by Washington's concerns about Russia's weak stance on intellectual property. [17] In November 2006, the United States became the last major WTO member country to approve Russia's entrance into WTO by signing a bilateral… [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
V Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
On March 5, 2024, in recognition of the 25th anniversary of the Washington Conference, 15 best practices were released in order to improve the practical implementation of the Washington Principles. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Cox Professor of Law, The George Washington University --Robert Cover, Legal Pluralism, and the Possibility of a Jurisgenerative Jurisprudence Avi Soifer. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
Likewise, setting adequate compensation, as required under TRIPS Article 31(h) has never been predictable or easily administered.[15] Additionally, and of similar importance, other questions remain outstanding, including which countries qualify for parallel imports,[16] navigating the complexities of licensing agreements,[17] ensuring timeliness during public health emergencies,[18] and achieving cooperation from pharmaceutical companies who arguably have little incentive to cooperate.[19]… [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 5:53 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
TrumpThis case was originally titled Tarla Makaeff et al v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 11:34 pm
If the size of my stacks are any indication of activity level, the most contentious areas of legal debate are, not surprisingly, privacy (Facebook, Google, Twitter et. al.), infrastructure (Net neutrality, Title II and the wireless spectrum crisis), copyright (the secret ACTA treaty, Limewire, Google v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
Swisa: implications for India (Spicy IP) Centre for Science and Environment accused of copyright infringement by Mint's editor (Spicy IP) Delhi High Court dicta on fair dealing increases woes of news channels: ESPN Stars Sports v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:50 pm
Lohmus, Havel & Viisemann, et al in 2005. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
For example, the US Congress,[2] the European Union[3] and its member states including the UK[4] and Ireland,[5] Australia[6] and others have been re-examining their copyright laws in light of the challenges posed by digital technologies. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm
Courts of Appeal after Blakely v. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 6:41 am
Let me expand on this theme in a little more detail. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 7:45 pm
The document includes somewhere between "very little" and "practically no" further committed language on the transatlantic decarbonization dimension of the plan, which remains, as a result, nebulous at best and clear as mud at worst. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360) Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons) Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian… [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Legislatures in the United States and abroad have passed increasingly restrictive and intrusive laws in order to protect the public from convicted sexual offenders. [read post]
