Search for: "Long v. Arnold" Results 181 - 200 of 601
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2019, 5:03 am by Florian Mueller
Nijhof explained to what extent courts in other jurisdictions do or do not believe that Huawei v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 7:17 am
This morning Lord Neuberger handed down the judgment of the UK Supreme Court in the Trunki case, PMS International Limited v Magmatic Limited [2016] UKSC 12. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:36 am by Francis Davey
Arnold J held that “it is for the landlord claiming unpaid ground rent under a long lease to plead and prove compliance with section 166?. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 3:59 am by Administrator
Les demandeurs réclament les honoraires professionnels qu’ils ont payés à leurs avocats dans le contexte de la vérification et tout au long des procédures qui les ont menés devant la Cour canadienne de l’impôt, la Cour fédérale et le Commissaire à l’information, en soutenant que l’ARC savait ou aurait dû savoir que la vérification était vouée à… [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:49 am
  41 In that regard, the fact that the sign in question could be denied registration on the basis of a number of grounds for refusal is irrelevant so long as any one of those grounds fully applies to that sign. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 8:40 am
Mr Justice Arnold, at first instance in the main judgment had held that Vestergaard was correct, and ordered an injunction. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
  The courts of England and Wales have long thought this question needs answering and have asked it in two previous referrals. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:12 am by Andres
We now may have a partial answer in the case of England And Wales Cricket Board Ltd v Tixdaq Ltd. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:33 am
Settling the point required the assistance of expert witnesses in the form of patent attorneys (providing long-winded but enthusiastic answers...para. 18). [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 3:22 pm
This post attracted the attention of long-time Katfriend Grégoire Triet (Avocat au Barreau de Paris and a partner in the Paris-based practice of Gide Loyrette Nouel). [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 3:49 am
In particular, it contended that it had terminated the Development Contract after Force India's repudiatory breach by persistent non-payment of sums due to it.The matter came before Arnold J in the Chancery Division of the High Court: Force India Formula One Team Ltd v 1 Malaysia Racing Team SDN BHD & Ors [2012] EWHC 616 (Ch) (21 March 2012). [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 1:00 am by CMS
However, with reference to the decision in Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36, the court considered that it is not its job to rescue a tenant from an “imprudent term” in a lease. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:19 pm
 Despite the length and keen attention to detail, there is no evidence to suggest that real author was Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]