Search for: "Long v. Provide Commerce, Inc." Results 181 - 200 of 977
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2019, 1:06 pm by Mithun Mansinghani
Mithun Mansinghani serves as solicitor general for the state of Oklahoma, which filed an amicus brief joined by 16 other states in support of the petitioners in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:54 pm by Justin Hepworth and Roburt Waldow
The Court’s 1986 decision in Complete Auto departed from this rigid analysis, and held that a state may tax interstate commerce so long as the tax (1) applies to an activity with a substantial nexus with the taxing state, (2) is fairly apportioned, (3) does not discriminate against interstate commerce, and (4) is fairly related to the services the state provides. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:54 pm by Justin Hepworth and Roburt Waldow
The Court’s 1986 decision in Complete Auto departed from this rigid analysis, and held that a state may tax interstate commerce so long as the tax (1) applies to an activity with a substantial nexus with the taxing state, (2) is fairly apportioned, (3) does not discriminate against interstate commerce, and (4) is fairly related to the services the state provides. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:54 pm by Justin Hepworth and Robert Waldow
The Court’s 1986 decision in Complete Auto departed from this rigid analysis, and held that a state may tax interstate commerce so long as the tax (1) applies to an activity with a substantial nexus with the taxing state, (2) is fairly apportioned, (3) does not discriminate against interstate commerce, and (4) is fairly related to the services the state provides. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Societe Nationale des Chemins de Fer Francais and Venice Simplon-Orient Express, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:04 am
  In support of their argument, defendants cite the recent United States Supreme Court case of Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
” At that conference on Friday, the court agreed to hear Department of Commerce v. [read post]