Search for: "Look v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 41,103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2009, 3:29 am
” But look at those requirements again. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 10:35 am by Guest & Gray
  The Court of Appeals looked to previous appellate decisions to reach this decision such as Schwartz v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:46 pm by Zachary Spilman
CAAF heard oral argument last week in the Article 62 appeal case of United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 4:01 pm by Jeff Gittins
The United States Court of Federal Claims recently issued its decision in the case of Klamath Irrigation v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 7:09 am by Rick Hasen
The post “Independent State Legislature Doctrine and Election Litigation After Moore v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 8:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, affording the legal malpractice cause of action a liberal construction and according the plaintiff every favorable inference, the complaint does state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see generally Hamoudeh v Mandel, 62 AD3d 948, 949; Maiolini v McAdams & Fallon, P.C., 61 AD3d 644, 645; Malik v Beal, 54 AD3d 910, 911). [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:08 am by Corey Rayburn Yung
I thought Justice Sotomayor would join the dissent based upon the oral argument, but it looks like Orin Kerr called the lineup exactly right with only Justices Scalia and Thomas dissenting (if my memory is right). [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:13 pm by Jon Gelman
One has to look seriously at the comments by John E. [read post]