Search for: "Lord v. Lord" Results 181 - 200 of 5,903
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2007, 9:21 am
Courtesy of ProfessorBainbridge.com, here are a few excerpts from the Chancery Court's findings of fact:Hollinger Intern., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:00 am by JONATHAN GLASSON QC, MATRIX
In March 2017, the Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Hughes) heard the appeal of the Metropolitan Police Service (“MPS”) in the case of Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v DSD & Anor. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 8:00 am by Jack Kennedy, Olswang LLP
They were: Rylands v Fletcher (1866) LR 3 HL 330 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256 Salomon v A Salomon & Co [1897] AC 22 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions [1935] AC 462 Liversidge v Anderson [1942] AC 206 Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 Anisminic… [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am by INFORRM
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 3:40 am
Previously, abuse claimants had 6 years to bring an action but the Lords in A v Hoare decided that this was wrongly imposed. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:34 am
Two appeals are listed in the Supreme Court this week with R v F and R v M being heard by Lords Hope, Rodger and Walker, Lady Hale and Lord Brown on Monday 6 December. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 1:08 am
Ashley and Another v Chief Constable of Sussex Police House of Lords “A civil claim against the police for assault and battery by the family of an unarmed man shot dead during a police raid was not to be struck out despite the responsible officer's acquittal of murder because, in civil law, a plea of mistaken self-defence required not only that the assailant's mistaken belief that he had been under threat had been honestly held, as required by the criminal law,… [read post]
3 May 2007, 6:53 am
Housing associations, in particular Riverside Housing Association, will have been popping champagne corks recently, to celebrate the result of the recent House of Lords decision in the case of Riverside Housing Association v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am by Frank Cranmer
As was said in Salvesen v Riddell 2013 SC (UKSC) 236 (Lord Hope at para 57), if such an order is made, it may be appropriate to give permission to the Lord Advocate to return to the court for any further orders under section 102(2)(b) as may be required. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 5:50 am
Author The Lud Licence Copyright waiver Jane LambertChancery Division (Lord Justice Warby) Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2021] EWHC 1245 (Ch) (12 May 2021)At a directions hearing before Lord Justice Warby on 5 May 2021, His Lordship granted summary judgment to the Duchess of Cambridge in her claim for copyright infringement against the publisher of The Mail on Sunday and The Mail [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 1:11 am
Lord Justice ThorpeThe case of Lawrence v Gallagher [2012] EWCA Civ 394, decided today, has caused a number of headlines, primarily because it is said to be the first substantial appeal concerning financial orders made following the dissolution of a Civil Partnership. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 10:04 am
E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary and Another House of Lords “The positive obligation imposed on the state by article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights to prevent the infliction by third parties of inhuman or degrading treatment was not unqualified and absolute. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:18 am
The hearing of the appeal by the Home Secretary in the Article 3 deportation case of MA (Somalia) began in the Supreme Court today before Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Sir John Dyson SCJ. [read post]
Thursday The Court is not sitting today, but judgment is being handed down in the joined criminal cases R v Jogee and R v Ruddock. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
Knowsley HT v White Lord Neuberger advances three reasons for an assured tenancy ending only with the execution of the order. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:04 am
The panel consisted of Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 11:58 am
Norris v USA: judgment in full "He described the obstruction charge as "subsidiary" to the price-fixing charge that the law lords ruled was not an extraditable offence. [read post]
13 May 2013, 2:23 pm
In HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 451 (3 May 2013), the Court of Appeal (Lord Justices Richards, Lewison and Kitchin) ventured again into what Lord Justice Lewison described at paragraph [140] of the Court's judgment as "the minefield of the exclusion from patentability of computer programs 'as such'". [read post]