Search for: "Louisiana v. Jackson" Results 181 - 200 of 378
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am by John Elwood
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 14-997, involving a similar Mississippi law, has been sent back to the waiting room. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm by John Elwood
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 14-997, which when we last saw it had been relisted six times. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am by John Elwood
Two-time relist Jackson v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 2:39 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Louisiana petition seeks to test that state’s ban even before the Fifth Circuit rules on it. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 4:19 pm by Steven Boutwell
State agencies, including those in Arkansas, Colorado, Louisiana, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma and Texas, have all reported to the U.S. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 7:07 am by Docket Navigator
Go-Devil Manufacturing Co. of LA, Inc. d/b/a Go-Devil Manufacturers of Louisiana, Inc., 3-08-cv-00124 (LAMD July 10, 2014, Order) (Jackson, J.) [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
” At the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, Brianne Gorod criticizes yesterday’s denial of review in Jackson v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:42 am
The latest case to challenge such verdicts, Jackson v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 4:42 am by Amy Howe
In his column for The (Baton Rouge) Advocate, James Gill criticizes Louisiana’s practice of allowing non-unanimous juries to convict in criminal cases; a Louisiana inmate, Ortiz Jackson, has asked the Court to review that practice and strike it down on the merits. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 6:59 am by Amy Howe
At the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, Elizabeth Wydra discusses Jackson v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:03 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana 2014). [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 5:13 am by Amy Howe
” The Text & History Blog of the Constitutional Accountability Center discusses the cert. petition that the CAC recently filed in Jackson v. [read post]