Search for: "Luban"
Results 181 - 200
of 257
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2008, 4:43 pm
Philosophy is good for what David Luban in another context called intellectual hygiene. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:22 pm
In the comments, Stephen Gillers and I disagreed with Luban. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 4:06 am
I confess to not having read Luban's book yet, so he may already have answered this. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 10:26 pm
When a Good Prosecutor Throws a Case David Luban Should a prosecutor throw a case to avoid sending men he thinks are innocent to jail? [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 7:30 pm
In this review of Legal Ethics Silver takes a shot at a number of Luban's arguments, but those that draw most obviously on his own earlier work, and Luban's response to it, are his assertion that in essence Luban has over-valorized the importance of what lawyers do, and his expressed irritation at Luban's response to his and Cross's pro bono argument. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 6:03 pm
(Luban knows the difference between government and a trade association.) [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 8:27 pm
Check out his first two posts, just below David Luban's important Commander in Chief post. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 6:12 pm
David Luban has written a remarkable post on the intellectual bankruptcy of the hypothetical, but that, of course, doesn't lessen the likelihood one whit that one of the bloviators--perhaps George Stephanopalous seeking to assure his audience that he's not a Democratic hack--will ask the question. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 4:17 pm
And don't forget to read David Luban below, dissecting the Administration's mantra that its use of the enhanced techniques "saved innocent lives. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 5:01 pm
"[UPDATE: My colleague David Luban is quite right to note, in addition -- and perhaps more importantly -- that there's nothing "simulated" about the drowning. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:41 pm
Let me know what you think.In an article published more than a dozen years ago, Professors Marc Galanter and David Luban argued that criminal defendants need additional procedural safeguards because of "two concerns â€â [read post]
8 May 2008, 11:44 am
Rev. 405 (2008) David Luban, On the Commander in Chief Power, 81 S. [read post]
7 May 2008, 6:22 am
Professor David Luban testified yesterday before the House Judiciary Committee. [read post]
2 May 2008, 1:53 am
David Luban here. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 6:02 pm
If you can't tell the difference between forcing and pouring... .As my colleague David Luban put it today, this Ashcroft exchange -- and a virtually identical attempt by Steven Bradbury before Congress last month to distinguish U.S. waterboarding from that of the Spanish Inquisition -- confirms "the underdeveloped jurisprudence of the forcing/pouring distinction. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 12:39 pm
One strand is that torture is a grave moral evil, the establishment of a "torture culture" (David Luban's term) in the United States has been a moral catastrophe, and we have ceded the moral high ground in international affairs for the foreseeable future. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 9:37 am
David Luban addresses torture for tots, and other weaknesses of ticking bomb arguments, in a new paper available here. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 9:37 am
David Luban addresses torture for tots, and other weaknesses of ticking bomb arguments, in a new paper available here. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 9:15 pm
As Professors Galanter and Luban de-scribe the problem, Even federal authorities will have no reason to believe that anything other than a typical series of []accidents has occurred unless they perform a statistical analysis of the pattern. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 9:12 pm
Today's post discusses a) how to bring rationality and fairness to determining the amount of retributive damages, b) how to allocate the retributive damages among the state, lawyer and plaintiff, and c) how this account offers prosaic justice, not poetic justice--and why that's ok, contra Luban, Galanter, Sebok, and Zipursky. [read post]
