Search for: "Lyle Roberts"
Results 181 - 200
of 910
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2017, 9:34 am
Roberts, Jr., disagreed. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 9:05 am
Roberts, Jr., wrote the dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Samuel A. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 12:40 pm
Roberts, Jr. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 12:40 pm
Roberts, Jr. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 4:40 am
At his eponymous blog, Lyle Denniston reports that in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s order, the student “asked a federal appeals court on Wednesday to move quickly to hold a new hearing and reach a new decision in his case … before he graduates from school on June 10. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 4:09 am
Additional coverage comes from Adam Liptak in The New York Times, Robert Barnes in The Washington Post, Richard Wolf in USA Today, Lydia Wheeler at The Hill, Daniel Fisher at Forbes, Pete Williams at NBC News, Nina Totenberg at NPR, the BBC News, Lyle Denniston at his eponymous blog and Mark Walsh at Education Week, who notes that “the issue could return to the high court within a year or two as other cases address whether Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which… [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 4:13 am
Additional coverage comes from Adam Liptak in The New York Times, Kevin Robillard at Politico, Robert Barnes and Gregory Schneider in The Washington Post and Lyle Denniston at his eponymous blog, who notes that under “the new ruling, … state legislatures generally will not be able to use race as the main redistricting factor even if a new map does not violate any traditional rules for districting – such as avoiding bizarre shapes and breaking up communities of… [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 7:30 pm
Robert Barnes and Gregory S. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 11:08 am
Roberts, Jr., and Justices Stephen G. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:53 am
Additional coverage of Sotomayor’s dissent comes from Robert Barnes in The Washington Post. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:27 pm
Professor Casto’s article, The Federal Courts’ Protective Jurisdiction over Torts Committed in Violation of the Law of Nation was cited in: Lyle D. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 3:32 am
Roberts Jr. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 4:12 am
In USA Today, Richard Wolf observes that Friday’s administration of the oath of office to President Donald Trump by Chief Justice John Roberts “could be the start of a match made in heaven — or the high point of a rocky relationship,” noting that “a chief justice who endured a testy relationship with Obama faces a potentially stormy one with Trump, who prefers bold strokes to Roberts’ minimalist brand of jurisprudence. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 3:25 am
At his eponymous blog, Lyle Denniston reports that a New Mexico lawyer’s effort to compel the Senate to vote on the nomination of Chief Judge Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court “may have reached its final point on Monday morning” when Chief Justice John Roberts denied an emergency request for an injunction; Roberts “acted without giving any reason, without sharing the issue with his colleagues, and even without seeking a response from… [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 10:38 am
"Roberts denies plea to force Senate action on Garland": The Associated Press has this report. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 4:22 am
Additional coverage comes from Lyle Denniston in his eponymous blog, who reports that two of the cases, Turner v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 7:08 pm
In today's edition of The Washington Post, Robert Barnes has an article headlined "Supreme Court rules for Samsung in smartphone patent dispute. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 10:32 am
In today's edition of The Washington Post, Robert Barnes has an article headlined "Supreme Court considers whether those facing deportation can be held indefinitely. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 4:38 am
At his eponymous blog, Lyle Denniston reports that a New Mexico lawyer whose attempt to force the Senate to act on the Garland nomination was rejected by a federal trial court for procedural reasons has appealed that decision to the U.S. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:13 am
” Briefly: At Constitution Daily, Lyle Denniston reports on the status of the court’s request six months ago that the parties in Zubik v. [read post]
