Search for: "Lynch, Appeal of" Results 181 - 200 of 1,815
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2021, 9:12 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The district court denied the request, and the First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 1:58 pm by Ellena Erskine
Troice narrowed Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 6:32 am by Olivia Lynch and Michael Samuels
In this episode, host Olivia Lynch is joined by Michael Samuels to discuss a recent decision from the Small Business Administration’s Office of Hearings and Appeals on the ostensible subcontractor rule as well as a recent Government Accountability Office decision sustaining a protest of an agency solicitation that required a joint venture competing for the award, as opposed to the individual members of the joint venture, to hold a top secret facility clearance. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:54 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Tradesman Program Managers LLC v Doyle, 2020 NY Slip Op 32452[U] [Sup Ct, Kings County 2020]; Barrison v D’Amato & Lynch, LLP, 2019 NY Slip Op 30905[U] [Sup Ct, NY County]; Lentini v 219 W. 20th St. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 6:28 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That was an incorrect interpretation of the statute, the Court of Appeals (Lynch, Sack and Park) says. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Jacob Pagano
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primarily affirmed the district court’s decision. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 6:01 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But the Court of Appeals (Parker, Lynch and Bianco) upholds the verdict.One issue is whether the trial court should have allowed plaintiff to tell the jury that the officer was arrested for domestic violence in a separate incident against his wife. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 6:26 am by Troy Rosasco
Those lawyers, however, sometimes need help with the unique application and appeal processes. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 6:52 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals (Cabranes, Lynch and Marrero [D.J.]) reasons:Under CTPU’s argument, an organization could establish  standing by claiming to have  been  injured  by  any  law  or regulation touching any issue within the scope of its mission (which the organization itself can define) so long as it expends resources to oppose that law or regulation. [read post]