Search for: "MALEE v DISTRICT COURT" Results 181 - 200 of 2,036
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2016, 6:32 am by Joy Waltemath
Granting partial summary judgment for the officer on the school district’s liability for discrimination under both Title VII and Nevada law—and only on that issue—a federal district court in Nevada found that the district’s bathroom ban was based on precisely the sort of sex stereotyping that the Ninth Circuit has found Title VII to prohibit (Roberts v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 5:53 am
The Eastern District of Michigan dismissed the claims in EEOC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 8:21 am by Jon Sands
  The government then moved, and the district court agreed, that he be committed to an adult facility for restoration. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 6:28 am by Joy Waltemath
It also vacated the district court’s order regarding attorneys’ fees and offset, because the case was “not yet over. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 8:24 am by Douglas Melcher
On May 31, 2012, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Campbell-Crane & Assocs., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 7:06 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals has reinstated a hostile work environment claim where a male supervisor treated everyone like garbage, heaping the worst abuse onto the women.The case is Castagna v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 5:16 am by Joy Waltemath
As an initial matter, the appeals court agreed with the district court that the male employee established a prima facie EPA case. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:27 am
District Court Applied Wrong Legal Criteria in Certifying Gender Discrimination Class Action Requiring Remand for Reconsideration based on Standards Enunciated in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 9:51 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 90733 (WD LA, June 13, 2017, a Louisiana federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2017 U.S. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
R.G, a suit in which a Michigan federal district court upheld a funeral home's defense under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act to a charge that it engaged in gender stereotyping when it dismissed a transgender employee who was in the process of transitioning from male to female. [read post]