Search for: "MARTINEZ, Correctional Officer"
Results 181 - 200
of 226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2014, 6:46 am
Assigned to Bloomberg’s London office in 2005, the employee executed an employment agreement that contained the combined choice-of-law and choice-of-forum clause. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 6:16 am
As previously stated, although we acknowledge that it seems logical that the laptop computer would have been discovered, the State failed to provide any evidence in this case, either through testimony concerning common practices of the fire department for inventorying employee's belongings or through testimony regarding continued search efforts in this case, indicating that investigating officers would have located the laptop. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:45 pm
Judge Jacobson concludes that Lakia is correct: "Both sides in this case have cited the seminal New Jersey decision that led to the adoption of the civil union statute and that of course is Lewis v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 6:24 am
Martinez was blind. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 8:17 pm
Martinez, 4 So. 3d 712 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Trump.That shifting produces an agit-prop moment quite distinct from that now iconic picture circulated by the office of the German Chancellor leader Ms. [read post]
29 May 2015, 5:57 am
In essence, the indictment alleges Bradbury posted a message on Facebook in which he threatened to bomb the Tippecanoe County Courthouse and kill certain law enforcement officers and judges. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 5:14 am
As the wrong-way truck continued it sideswiped a van with correctional officers as passengers; then a 4th vehicle occupied by Marine recruits was struck by debris. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
Martinez and Luz Elena D. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
On the federal side, then, we see unanimity against arbitration based on waiver while on the state side two appellate courts overrule one trial court and established the opposite position as the “correct” decision on the question presented.But if the decision-making unit is redefined as the participating judicial decisionmaker (as opposed to the court as an institution), there is no longer unanimity on either side. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 1:46 pm
Naval officer. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am
Martinez, 436 U.S. 49 (1978) (tribal membership); Parks v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am
Martinez, 436 U.S. 49 (1978) (tribal membership); Parks v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 2:53 am
Martinez is still listed even though he's been dead since 2000. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 7:00 pm
Other than the defendant, the only other persons present were the presiding Justice and the arresting officer who was a Sergeant Investigator of the New York State Police. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Martinez-Melgar, No. 08-4569 Sentence on a defendant convicted of drug trafficking and firearm possession is vacated and remanded for resentencing as the district court clearly erred in concluding, on the basis of the record, that defendant's admission of guilt occurred in a judicial proceeding in open court, and as such, certain criminal history points should not have been assessed. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Martinez-Melgar, No. 08-4569 Sentence on a defendant convicted of drug trafficking and firearm possession is vacated and remanded for resentencing as the district court clearly erred in concluding, on the basis of the record, that defendant's admission of guilt occurred in a judicial proceeding in open court, and as such, certain criminal history points should not have been assessed. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
And the IRS can't decide whether those arguments are correct; as the D.C. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:19 am
There will be more depth available here (granularity of taxonomy) than is found in the Solo product due to the complexity of research that associates conduct, as well as helping identify the correct synonyms within legal topics based upon the Lexis Taxonomy. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
United States raises a “colorable question” as to the correctness of the Fifth Circuit's decision it reversed or provides no “basis to conclude that” it “created an intervening change or ‘correction’ in the applicable law”; and 2) whether an appeal from the denial of double jeopardy relief following a judgment of acquittal may be not “colorable” so as to destroy appellate jurisdiction, or whether appellate… [read post]
