Search for: "MATTER OF A N W"
Results 181 - 200
of 2,425
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2023, 11:23 am
“[W]here it is claimed that a duty of disclosure violation impaired the stockholders' right to cast an informed vote, that claim is direct. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 5:23 pm
Dean, 3 So.3d 1035, 1047 n. 18 (Fla. 2009). [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:13 pm
App’x 403, 406 & n.6 (5th Cir. 2013) (citing TEX. [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:37 am
Board of Com’rs of Orleans Levee Dist., 294 F.3d 684, 690 n. 4 (5th Cir. 2002) [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:19 am
["[W]e find no error by the trial court in finding that Father had mentally abused N. [read post]
24 May 2023, 9:17 am
As an initial matter, it benefits companies to demonstrate a “culture of compliance. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
We note below where further information would be helpful before reaching any firm conclusion on a matter. [read post]
12 May 2023, 11:45 am
” The court asked a series of questions relevant to trying to define the phrase: [W]ho determines whether a consensus exists to begin with? [read post]
4 May 2023, 7:38 am
The court found the officer had a “reasonable opportunity” to observe the speed of defendant’s vehicle, and any question about the credibility of the officer’s testimony was one for the jury, not a matter of admissibility. [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:39 am
” While context is relevant to that, it’s ad context, not any possible context: [W]hat is relevant to the analysis is not the number of products purchased, their exact identity, or the circumstances under which they were purchased; what matters is the nature of the allegedly false statement and how consumers interact with the false statement and therefore understand it. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
FORD LILLIAN WAN, JJ. 2019-14251 (Index No. 608005/19) [*1]In the Matter of Town of Hempstead, petitioner, vNew York State Division of Human Rights, et al., respondents. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
FORD LILLIAN WAN, JJ. 2019-14251 (Index No. 608005/19) [*1]In the Matter of Town of Hempstead, petitioner, vNew York State Division of Human Rights, et al., respondents. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:02 am
Decisions this Week Inter-American Court of Human RightsMoya Chacón v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 8:19 am
Co. of N. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:50 am
The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the matter to the trial court. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
Assailed from all quarters for being not tough enough, for being too tough, for being fundamentally misconceived, for threatening freedom of expression, for technological illiteracy, for threatening privacy, for excessive Ministerial powers, or occasionally for the sin of not being some other Bill entirely – and yet enjoying almost universal cross-party Parliamentary support – the UK’s Online Safety Bill is now limping its way through the House of Lords. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:29 am
In addition, there is the requirement to fill out Schedule N, regarding the distribution of its assets and whether there were successor organizations and any “officer, director, trustee, or key employee” involved in them.[9] The organization is also required to attach to their final return copies of their dissolution documents, which may include “articles of dissolution or merger, resolutions and plans of liquidation or merger. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
Assailed from all quarters for being not tough enough, for being too tough, for being fundamentally misconceived, for threatening freedom of expression, for technological illiteracy, for threatening privacy, for excessive Ministerial powers, or occasionally for the sin of not being some other Bill entirely – and yet enjoying almost universal cross-party Parliamentary support - the UK’s Online Safety Bill is now limping its way through the House of Lords. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:24 pm
" In a March 2023 order denying a motion for a preliminary injunction in Delaware State Sportsmen's Ass'n v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:27 am
See id. at 2123 & n.1 (noting that forty-three states are "shall-issue" states, in which pretty much all law-abidi [read post]
