Search for: "MATTER OF H D"
Results 181 - 200
of 3,814
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Morris James Attorneys Selected by their Peers for Inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America® 2011
4 Aug 2010, 1:14 pm
Matterer (2009) LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW • David H. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:18 am
H. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:18 am
H. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 1:36 pm
Nor is there any federal law prohibiting the sale, manufacture or distribution to U.S. persons of computer programs that, when used as designed, result in the creation of such a 3-D firearm. [read post]
7 Nov 2015, 8:10 am
Finkelstein, David H. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 7:07 am
[h/t to Bill Freivogel]. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 1:05 pm
Prosecutors allege that the bagel wholesaler, the owner of H & H Bagels, collected, but failed to pay, $369,318.77 withheld from his bagel business employees. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 5:06 pm
A correct conclusion, I believe, by Judge James H. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 3:23 pm
In an unusual ruling, Nassau County Family Court Judge Stacy D. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:19 pm
Under Regulation 64, there are only two kinds of letters that must do so:letters "rejecting any element of a claim involving personal property insurance" (11 NYCRR § 216.6[h]); andletters explaining or rejecting any element of a claim for auto physical damage (11 NYCRR § 216.7[d][3]). [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 9:49 am
Under Regulation 64, there are only two kinds of letters that must do so:letters "rejecting any element of a claim involving personal property insurance" (11 NYCRR § 216.6[h]); andletters explaining or rejecting any element of a claim for auto physical damage (11 NYCRR § 216.7[d][3]).Let's take these in reverse order. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 9:41 am
Under Regulation 64, there are only two kinds of letters that must do so: letters "rejecting any element of a claim involving personal property insurance" (11 NYCRR § 216.6[h]); andletters explaining or rejecting any element of a claim for auto physical damage (11 NYCRR § 216.7[d][3]).Let's take these in reverse order. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 3:09 am
Copyright © 2009, Mitchell H. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 9:40 am
Former federal Judge H. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 5:56 pm
(Jonathan H. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 4:20 am
L.J. 989 (2004)] cited to Cecil D. [read post]
20 May 2015, 1:40 pm
Matter of J-H-J-, 26 I&N Dec. 563 (BIA 2015); The Board held that only aliens who originally entered the United States as lawful permanent residents (with an immigrant visa) are barred from INA § 212(h) relief for a prior aggravated felony conviction. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
In the Matter of Law Offices of Cory H. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
In the Matter of Law Offices of Cory H. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 3:50 am
United States, striking down part of an Arizona immigration law, and argues that the decision “includes language highlighting the ‘broad discretion’ the executive branch enjoys in matters relating to immigration. [read post]
