Search for: "MATTER OF J C B"
Results 181 - 200
of 3,043
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2019, 2:15 pm
C-48-CV-2019-1979 (C.P. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 6:28 am
Santos, J., abused its discretion by denying his petition for certification to appeal, as (1) the motion to withdraw pursuant to an Anders brief filed by appointed habeas counsel was granted improperly, (2) his constitutional rights were violated by the courts’ failure to appoint substitute habeas counsel and to grant him access to a law library, and (3) there are triable issues concerning (a) newly discovered evidence and his actual innocence, (b) loss of statutory good time… [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 11:00 pm
However, where, as here, fraud is pled, there are additional pleading requirements under F.R.C.P. 9(b) to plead such claims with particularity. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 12:27 pm
These factors are: (a) the seriousness of the offense; (b) the extent of harm caused by the offense; (c) the evidence of guilt, whether admissible or inadmissible at trial; (d) the history, character and condition of the defendant; (e) any exceptionally serious misconduct of law enforcement personnel; (f) the purpose and effect of imposing upon defendant a sentence authorized for the offense; (g) the impact of a dismissal on the safety or welfare of the community; (h) the impact… [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm
C&J Energy Service, Inc., et al., C.A. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 5:27 am
The matter then went to the Supreme Court of Ohio. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 1:36 am
Oswald, J. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 10:21 am
The Court focused on the matter of conscience. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:20 am
” (emphasis supplied) A Single Judge of the Madras High Court (Subbiah, J.) held the following: a) Where the subject matter before the court involves arbitrable and non-arbitrable matters, the civil court can proceed with the suit and decide the entire subject matter. b) In the present case, the relief sought for is permanent injunction restraining Dhandapani from interfering with its business, including injunction against sending of henchmen to… [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 8:00 am
Recently, in Matter of Holmgren, Queens County Surrogate Peter J. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:49 pm
C. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 11:37 pm
David J. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 6:13 am
§ 2B1.1(b)(2)(A) rather than a 6-level enhancement under § 2B1.1(b)(2)(C). [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 3:55 am
Common Sense Press Inc. d/b/a Pocket Jacks Comics v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 4:53 am
More from our authors: Patent Protection for Second Medical Uses by Jochen Bühling (ed.) [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 3:18 am
J.). [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:19 am
This is not a small matter. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:59 am
When the demand did not prompt a response, defendant on April 22, 2008 moved to dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b). [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:08 pm
A.B.C. in the matter of P.C., a minor, __ N.J. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 7:20 am
Infringement – applying the Doctrine of Equivalents At paragraph 304 Birss J noted that “neither party devoted much effort” to a point on added matter and, likewise, this note does not consider the point further. [read post]
