Search for: "MATTER OF POWERS v. Powers"
Results 181 - 200
of 21,821
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2010, 1:19 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
Very possibly, but the matter could get complicated.One objection might be that such a measure—giving the legislature power to overrule the judiciary—violates separation of powers. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 2:55 pm
Sandvig v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 1:57 pm
The case is Compcare Wellness Medical Scheme v Registrar of Medical Schemes and Others. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 9:14 am
Reflecting this same outlook, the Supreme Court held in 1838 in Kendall v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 9:16 am
Silver, 16 ' Larabee v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 2:20 pm
The Court’s jurisdiction had been challenged in an amicus brief filed in the case of Puerto Rico v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
As Professor Henry Monaghan has pointed out, Justice Black's opinion for the Court in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:45 am
It was introduced in Nixon v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Department of Transportation v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 10:02 am
Circuit on July 6, American Rivers and Alabama Rivers Alliance v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 2:56 am
Regina (Lewis) v Coroner for Mid and North Division of Shropshire and Another Court of Appeal “There was only a power, but not a duty, on a coroner to leave possibly, but not probably causative matters to the jury. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 10:29 pm
” The pronouncement of the Court in this matter is sure to be eagerly watched by prosecutors, defence lawyers and the police.The third matter (Sarah Mathew v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 8:40 pm
Crooker & v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 3:34 am
Pitt and another v Holt and another; Futter and another v Futter and Others [2011] EWCA Civ 197; [2011] WLR (D) 84 “Where trustees, acting within their powers, carried out a transaction which was said to be vitiated by breach of trust on the ground that the trustees failed to have regard to a relevant matter, and where the reason that they did not have regard to it was that they had obtained and acted on advice from apparently competent advisers which turned… [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 12:18 pm
See Tibbs v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 7:22 am
(aka The Chinese Exclusion Case), which announced that immigration control was “an incident of sovereignty” and thus a matter for Congressional—not state or judicial—power. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 7:06 am
The holder of the power of attorney in the Martin v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 3:03 pm
Moreover, they add, in its 2011 decision in American Electric Power v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 1:48 pm
Kerry), in which the Court insisted that the president “can rely [for his authority] only upon his own constitutional powers minus any constitutional powers of Congress over the matter. [read post]
