Search for: "MATTER OF R T"
Results 181 - 200
of 53,756
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
”[3.4] In the present case […] the ED summoned to OPs indicating that claims 1 and 15 lacked clarity and that the subject-matter of these claims lacked novelty in view of D3. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 3:09 am
You can't very well evaluate a litigation firm after four years of work on a case (See my post of Nov. 16, 2005: evaluations of law firms with 9 references.). [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 9:51 am
If words hurt, or even if they simply have the potential to hurt, it doesn’t matter what is “in your heart. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 12:00 am
Does she talk as if she has experience with this type of matter? [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:01 pm
This was clear from decisions T 305/08 and T 452/05. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:50 am
Media Matters isn’t exactly known for clamming up when criticized. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
Sometimes the Boards indicated that R 65(2) EPC 1973 was preferred to R 88 EPC 1973 as it was more specific (T 715/01 [9]); (b) decisions in which R 88 EPC 1973 was used as a legal basis for the corrections (T 814/98); (c) decisions in which correction was refused because the notice of appeal contained no remediable errors but rather a mistake of law. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 10:02 am
[edited and updated] I don't know why this development hasn't generated more discussion, but the State Bar of California changed the evidentiary standards in discipline cases from the ones that apply in civil matters to the ones that apply in administrative matters. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 1:48 pm
It also matters a great deal that the latest fallen star is an academic and a feminist.... [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 5:33 pm
In short, size matters. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
According to the written decision, the ED considered that the subject-matter of this request contravened R 164(2) and R 137(5). [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:25 pm
On 18 June 2014 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 6:00 am
Don't miss this issue. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 7:00 am
Don't miss this issue. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 12:59 pm
Don't miss this issue. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 6:00 am
Don't miss this issue. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 1:57 pm
Don't miss this issue. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
In its petition for review the opponent argued that Board 3.2.03 had violated its right to be heard in opposition case T 928/10.The petitioner explained that it had requested a hearing of the witnesses Namensen and Karlsson in its statement of grounds of appeal. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 5:53 pm
THE REASON FOR OBAMA’S THIN SKIN: “It truly didn’t matter what anyone said about W, because he had such a firmly established core being, it matters utterly what the critics say about the UR’s clothes, because there is no emperor. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 7:41 am
AT&T), and ship from there. [read post]
