Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF COMMISSION ON CH"
Results 181 - 200
of 250
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2021, 4:25 pm
As already mentioned, judgment was handed down in the case of HRH Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers ([2021] EWHC 1245 (Ch) by Warby LJ on 12 May 2021. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm
The Codes of the media regulators – including Ofcom and the Press Complaints Commission – attempt non-exhaustive definitions of the public interest. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 7:56 am
Code Ann. ch. 31-14-4 et seq. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
"Prosser on Torts states something similar - "Where there is a normal situation, coearly identical with that contemplated by the statute or regulation, it. . .can be ruled as a matter of law that the actor has done his full duty by complying with the statute, and nothing more is required. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Second, the department’s analysis of the spineflower mitigation measures was legally impermissible because there was no substantial evidence that the mitigation matters were adequate. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 3:39 pm
The trial court ruled that a Japanese manufacturer could indeed be validly served that way. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 10:23 am
The preamble to the Act declares the object sought to be achieved by the RTI Act thus: "An Act to provide for setting out the practical regime of right to information for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public authorities, in order to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority, the constitution of a Central Information Commission and State Information Commissions and for matters connected… [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm
The Guardian had a piece “The Trump rule? [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
Google is wrong to distinguish between the “commission of a wrong” and “consequent loss/harm”. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
After argument, the trial judge granted the County's [Court Rules] 12(b)(6) motion, determining as a matter of law that records of private cell phone use can never be public records under the PRA. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
The topic had already been subject to nearly 20 references to the CJEU for preliminary rulings, and yes, there would be more from the court in 2017 as the decisions in Filmspeler, C-527/15, and Ziggo, C-601/15 (The Pirate Bay) loomed! [read post]
7 May 2018, 10:25 pm
IN THE MATTER OF THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT LOAN TRUSTS 2003-1, 2004-1, 2004-2, 2005-1, 2005-2 and 2005-3.C.A. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 4:04 am
The amendment permits Delaware corporations to essentially opt out of the Van Gorkom rule. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Public Interest Defense The law of confidentiality is based on the principle that people who are entrusted with confidential information ought, as a general rule, to respect it. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 4:34 pm
On 5 March 2021 Warby LJ handed down a judgment ([2021] EWHC 510 (Ch)) following 2 March 2021 hearing. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am
There was a piece on the ICO’s website and the Mishcon de Reya Data Matters blog. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The court first held that applying SB 35 to the project would not violate the “home rule” doctrine regarding charter cities, reasoning that the Legislature may infringe on the City’s authority when it sufficiently articulates a statewide interest, such as was done in the adoption of SB 35 to “address[] the crisis level statewide lack of affordable housing by eliminating local discretion to deny approval where specified objective planning criteria are met. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm
Likewise, the SEC frequently has brought ethics actins against litigators whom the Commission thinks violated the rules while defending clients charged with securities violations. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm
Indeed, the legitimate starting point of a pre-charge reasonable expectation of privacy applies after arrest and before charge, where the rules on contempt also apply (WFZ v British Broadcasting Corporation [2023] EWHC 1618 (KB) (29 June 2023)). [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am
Ockleton Ch observed: “[7]. [read post]
