Search for: "MCINTYRE v. THE STATE" Results 181 - 200 of 366
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm by NL
Eastland Homes Partnership Limited v Sandra Whyte 2010 EWHC 695 (QB) Following Weaver v L&Q and McIntyre v Gentoo, here is a clear indication of the brave new world of public law in which RSLs (sorry, PRHPs) find themselves. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm by NL
Eastland Homes Partnership Limited v Sandra Whyte 2010 EWHC 695 (QB) Following Weaver v L&Q and McIntyre v Gentoo, here is a clear indication of the brave new world of public law in which RSLs (sorry, PRHPs) find themselves. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 3:35 am
Additional facts were not available at the New York Sun site (but are at links below).It is worth pointing out here that anonymous speech is well protected under the First Amendment in accordance with the Supreme Court's ruling in McIntyre v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Friday 23 October, the Supreme Court will hand down the judgment of R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 2:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 9:02 pm
  The Electronic Frontier Foundation quotes the decision in McIntyre v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:30 am by Kiran Bhat
At Concurring Opinions, Dave Hoffman discusses a recently filed complaint which tests the intentional tort exception to the requirement that a defendant purposefully avail himself of a state’s laws for that state to exercise personal jurisdiction – an exception that Justice Kennedy specifically mentioned in his opinion last Term in McIntyre v. [read post]