Search for: "ME Global, Inc. v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 262
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2010, 2:30 am by Kelly
United States (Patently-O) CAFC finds claim construction arguments waived on appeal: Enovsys LLC v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:30 am by Kelly
(TechnoLlama)   United States US General eBay venue selection clause upheld in Texas: In re eBay, Inc (Technology & Marketing Law Blog)   US Patents – Decisions Judicial economy and risk of inconsistent claim constructions warrant transfer of venue from Easter District of Texas: U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm by Steven M. Taber
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, July 2, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Comite Civico Del Valle,Inc. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California: Comite Civico Del Valle, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
(IP tango)   Switzerland Further step to Swiss Federal Patent Court (EPLAW)   United Kingdom Reminder: an appeal is not a re-hearing: Nampak Cartons Ltd v Rapid Action Packaging Ltd (PatLit) Stretching copyright with contract: Global Coal Ltd v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:24 am by Gene Quinn
On May 7, 2010, Nokia Corporation escalated its patent war with Apple, Inc., by filing yet another patent infringement action against Apple in the United States Federal District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
Smith Distributing Company, Inc. entered into an agreement with the U.S. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
Premium Aircraft (EPLAW)   United States US General Team Conan leaving jokes behind (IP Osgoode)   US Patent Reform Patent Reform legislation update (Inventive Step)   US Patents First-to-file vs first-to-invent: Why is there a Dispute? [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]