Search for: "MEANS V. STATE" Results 181 - 200 of 68,933
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2024, 2:41 pm
Its meaning is fairly clear, and is basically a more graphic equivalent of "Don't be greedy. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:44 pm by Little Health Law
What does the rule mean by stating that an employer may not “enforce” an existing non-compete? [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:43 pm by James W. Ward
This case is a win for employers because it ensures a consistent standard is applied to the NLRB when seeking 10(j) injunctions, which is especially important for multi-state employers. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am by David N. Crapo
Justice Sonia Sotomayor delivered the Supreme Court’s unanimous opinion1 in Truck Insurance Exchange v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am by David N. Crapo
Justice Sonia Sotomayor delivered the Supreme Court’s unanimous opinion1 in Truck Insurance Exchange v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am by David N. Crapo
Justice Sonia Sotomayor delivered the Supreme Court’s unanimous opinion1 in Truck Insurance Exchange v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
The Court's holding means that federal laws can constitute commands even when they do not legally compel the states to act. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 9:05 am by Simon Lovegrove (UK)
Final report: Draft Implementing Technical Standards on the reporting on asset-referenced tokens under Article 22(7) of MiCAR and on e-money tokens denominated in a currency that is not an official currency of a Member State pursuant to Article 58(3) of that Regulation and Annexes I, II, III, IV and V. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Green (University of Mississippi - School of Law) has posted Moral Reality as a Guide to Original Meaning: In Defense of United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 6:31 am by Barry Barnett
Constitution allowed Congress to empower head of agency to decide how much yearly funding it would receive up to a cap. 22-448_o7jp.pdf (supremecourt.gov) KSR test for obviousness of patents on inventions also applies to patents on designs. 21-2348.OPINION.5-21-2024_2321050.pdf (uscourts.gov) Whether buyer could escape promise to buy merger target turned on unclear meaning of “promulgate” in context of SEC rules. [read post]