Search for: "Macy v. Macy"
Results 181 - 200
of 226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2018, 6:03 pm
The defendant in the recent case of People v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 4:13 am
In Telsaint v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 3:49 am
A few years back in Georgia v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:24 am
Macy's - $26.24 Gosh, I love this color. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 6:03 pm
The defendant in the recent case of People v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 2:51 am
Yes, in the case of Collins v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 2:51 am
Yes, in the case of Collins v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 2:51 am
Yes, in the case of Collins v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
Yes, in the case of Collins v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 5:00 am
Macy Petty is a pro-life activist who was falsely portrayed as crying outside of the Supreme Court after its overturning of Roe v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 8:49 am
The EEOC Guidance specifically refers to two cases addressing discrimination on the basis of gender identity, both of which offer direction for employers: In Macy v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
22 May 2019, 2:29 pm
Penney, Kohl’s, Macy’s, and Sears for violating California’s Unfair Competition law, Cal. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 4:57 pm
Implications for Employers The theories of liability articulated by the EEOC in this case closely follow the EEOC’s prior landmark administrative ruling titled Macy v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 12:01 am
Macy Elevator v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 12:14 pm
Nokia v Apple â€" With FRANDS like these who needs enemies? [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 12:11 pm
In Universal Music v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 11:12 am
Macy’s West Stores, Inc. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 3:54 am
Douglas 05-6458 USA v. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 9:05 am
Nor did the EEOC’s April ruling in Macy v Holder create a new protected class of transgender people, Feldblum said. [read post]
