Search for: "Makely v. United States Air Force" Results 181 - 200 of 1,219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am by David Wagner
This post is based on input and analysis from Reed Smith attorneys across the United States. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:21 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Stephen Campbell offered to purchase Ricardo an air ticket to visit the United States again that year, but Ricardo refused despite Stephen Campbell's urging. [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:22 am
Sember was “indicted for stealing certain United States Air Force sensitive and proprietary technical, engineering and computer data and codes having a value in excess of $1,000 in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:31 am by Steve Baird
Not every day does the United States Supreme Court weigh in on a topic impacting the trademark world, but it did so yesterday in Already, LLC v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 4:50 pm
Review granted on the following issue: WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN NOT CONSIDERING THIS COURT'S DECISION IN UNITED STATES v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:53 pm
Institutional Architecture of Law and Governance:  The United States and Law Making-- The Administrative Branches: The Non-Delegation Doctrine, An Introduction.Notes for--Mistretta v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 5:01 am by Kristina Lorch, John Sullivan Baker
” In Nixon, the Court ruled that President Richard Nixon was immune from any liability related to the firing of an Air Force employee as part of a “reorganization and reduction in force,” because such personnel decisions fell “well within the outer perimeter of his authority” to supervise the Air Force. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by Scott R. Anderson, Molly E. Reynolds
Instead, the United States provides the [Saudi]-led coalition defense articles and services, including air-to-air refueling; certain intelligence support; and military advice, including advice regarding compliance with the law of armed conflict and best practices for reducing the risk of civilian casualties. [read post]