Search for: "March v. Municipal Court" Results 181 - 200 of 914
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2013, 1:40 pm
Neither “person” or “municipality,” as defined by the Bankruptcy Code, expressly includes or excludes an Indian tribe, and no reported court decisions have expressly addressed whether an Indian tribe is eligible to file for bankruptcy as person, municipality, or otherwise. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 9:32 am
Docket: 08-567 Title: Agripost, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:37 am
Requesting the reconsideration of an administrative determination does not toll the statute of limitations for bring an Article 78 actionMatter of Barresi v County of Suffolk, 2010 NY Slip Op 03439, Decided on April 27, 2010, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentPhilip R. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:07 am by Laura Sandwell
For individual case details please visit the following: BAI Ltd v Thomas Bates and Son Ltd, BAI Ltd v Durham, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance , Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance Company and Adur District Council and Ors, Independent Insurance Company Ltd v Fleming and Anor, Municipal Mutual Insurance Company v Zurich Insurance Company and Ors, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v… [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 8:34 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals agrees that plaintiff cannot sue the city.The case is Outlaw v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Municipal Law: ElectionsToronto (City) v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 11:13 am by Mark C. Niles
Seventeen years after Monroe, the Supreme Court took a second swing at the issue of municipal liability under Section 1983 in Monell v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 3:45 am
Halifax (Regional Municipality) (March 19, 2007, N.S.S.C.) and Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:52 pm by PaulKostro
Innes, 117 N.J. 496, 518 (1990) (stating a settlement agreement should be enforced by a trial court only to the extent it is equitable and just); Miller v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:39 am by Layla Kuhl
  In Tomasik, Court directed the trial court to disclose to the defendant the March 26, 2003 report authored by Timothy Zwart of Pine Rest Christian Mental Health Services and the March 1, 2003 form authored by Denise Joseph-Enders. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:00 pm by PaulKostro
Grimado, (Decided: March 8, 2010) (Bergen), March 11, 2010, BER-C-247-09: A party to a civil action is entitled to a trial by jury only if that right existed at common law when the New Jersey Constitution was adopted. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 4:54 am by Charles Sartain
Co-author Brittany Blakey The Texas Supreme Court has granted petition for review of a 2019 decision in Dyer et al v. [read post]