Search for: "Mark Connot"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2023, 3:39 am
" Applicant argued that the marks, although identical, have different connotations, since the cited mark "conveys a strong commercial impression of a restaurant focused primarily on ‘chicken’ entrees made from ‘scratch. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 4:25 am
The design of Wilson's mark was not sufficient to distinguish it from the mark FUBU. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 8:00 pm
The words OLD TIMER in applicant's mark have no such connotation (much less a specific connotation). [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 2:44 am
Coggins) [Refusal to register OLLIA-TECH for "Non-stick coatings for pans, cookware, baking trays, small electric kitchen apparatus and utensils; and Frying pans; skillets; earthenware saucepans; saucepans; pots for cooking; household utensils, namely, graters; kitchen utensils, namely, splatter screens," in view of the registered mark OLIA DESIGN for “glass wares, namely, decorative, and handcraft art objects of glass; beverage glassware; mugs; cups and mugs”… [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:35 am
Canoe Connotation?? [read post]
14 May 2008, 4:15 am
As to the first, the marks had "very different connotations," and in the second, the different first words in the marks also gave "very different connotations" to the marks. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 5:47 am
"In sum, "[t]he marks are quite dissimilar in appearance, sound, and connotation and commercial impression when considered in their entireties. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 9:39 am
Connotations of 'Ram', 'Rampant' and 'Rambo' are all there for the asking, with the risk of 'Damage' if ignored. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:33 am
" In addition to similarity in connotation, however, the Board must consider the appearance, sound, and overall commercial impression of the two marks in determining likelihood of confusion.The Board found the marks dissimilar in appearance but somewhat similar in sound. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 6:48 pm
"Because of the differences in appearance and connotation, the commercial impressions made by the marks also differ. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 1:58 am
Comparison of marks As for comparing the relevant marks, the Board noted that a global assessment of likelihood of confusion would need to be carried out, as the average consumer normally perceives a mark as a whole (C-251/95, Sabel, and others). [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:36 am
Applicant argued that there is an incongruity in its mark that creates an entirely different connotation to the consumer as compared to the cited mark. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:51 am
The Board therefore found MAPPIN & WEBB and M WEBB to be more dissimilar than similar in terms of appearance, sound, connotation and commercial impression, and it dismissed the opposition. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 4:02 am
The Board concluded that the marks are different in appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 4:04 am
The Board found the marks to be similar, noting that both marks suggest garments made of wool with "technical" or "technological" performance features. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 3:35 am
This is especially true, given the nature of both Applicant’s and Registrant’s goods.The Board concluded that, although the marks have some differences in sight and sound, "there are striking similarities in connotation, and, ultimately, overall commercial impression. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:49 am
" Of course, weak marks merit less protection on the Section 2(d) battlefield.The Board, however, never inquired as to whether PEACE & LOVE has a suggestive or descriptive connotation. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 2:40 am
"In sum, the marks are similar in appearance and sound, and convey substantially similar connotations and commercial impressions.Respondent claimed that there are a number of similar business under similar marks, but he provided no evidentiary support for that assertion. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 6:13 pm
Therefore, the Board found that this factor favors a finding of likelihood of confusion.Finally, turning to the marks at issue, the crucial issue became the connotation of the marks in question. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 3:23 am
" The Board therefore agreed with the examining attorney that applicant's mark is virtually identical ... in appearance, sound, connotation and commercial impression, to the registered marks. [read post]
