Search for: "Mark E. Howe"
Results 181 - 200
of 7,513
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2010, 2:29 am
How would you rule? [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:03 am
Mark Klamberg of Uppsala University Department of Law in Sweden writes in with the following guest post on European laws governing metadata collection and how it compares with U.S. law on the subject. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 7:50 pm
In theory, this is how it works.You get married, once, to someone you love. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 4:21 am
Does the Board realize how difficult and expensive a patent search can be?] [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:09 am
" How do you think this came out? [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 9:40 am
Registration was granted in 1999 (in 2014 the trade mark was transferred to Rubik’s Brand).In 2006, Simba Toys filed an application for a declaration of invalidity of the mark, on the basis of what are now Articles 59(1)(a) and 7(1)(a)-(c) and (e) EUTMR. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 11:18 am
Today's GW IP colloquium featured Mark Schultz, who spoke on Copynorms: Copyright and Social Norms. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 10:00 pm
Applications by e-mail are preferred (the transcripts may be sent by regular mail): criley@law.harvard.eduThe deadline for applications is February 15, 2012, and announcement of the award will be made by March 15, 2012.Additional information is here. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:11 am
TTABlog comment: How did you do? [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 4:50 am
” [para 72]One of the artworks that Oslo municipality is trying to have registered as a trade mark:The Angry Boy (Sinnataggen)The rationale of the various absolute grounds for refusal of registrationAccording to the Court this also follows from consideration of how Article 3(1)(b) to (e) of the Trade Mark Directive acknowledges the need to keep a sign available for general use [para 73, referring to paragraphs 33 ff in the 2008 Opinion of AG… [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR BREVARD COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA ___________________________________ REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT __________________________________ MARK S. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 3:20 am
How do you think this came out? [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:02 pm
Subsection 6(5)(e) of the Act states that the “degree of resemblance” between the marks is relevant in assessing confusion. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 3:21 am
The Examining Attorney refused registration under Section 2(e)(1) on the ground of mere descriptiveness. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 9:29 pm
Many thanks to Caffeinated Thoughts author Shane Vander Hart for calling my attention to an interesting piece by Randy E. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 2:05 pm
How about other hidden expenses? [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 3:15 am
”] In re Donald E. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 9:03 pm
Professor Mark P. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 3:08 am
The Board affirmed a Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register the mark SUPERJAWS, finding it merely descriptive of machine tools and hand tools, including jaws and metal vice jaws. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 7:31 am
The Advancetrack decision E-Accounting Solutions Ltd (t/a Advancetrack) v Global Infosys Ltd (t/a GI Outsourcing) was a 2023 High Court trade mark infringement dispute (concerning adwords). [read post]
