Search for: "Mark Fish v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 466
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2008, 10:56 pm
United States Fish & Wildlife Serv., 378 F.3d 1059 (9th Cir. 2004), , the biological opinion in this case does not contemplate actual action. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:57 am
[Given the current state of the law, is it really necessary to ask this question? [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 2:14 am
EUIPO, long before the Levola decision, had already stated its “distaste” for scent marks, as clearly indicated in its Guidelines:” Article 3(9) EUTMIR clarifies that the filing of a sample or a specimen does not constitute a proper representation of a trade mark. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:07 am
By Mark S. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 5:52 pm
Defenders of Wildlife v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 2:04 pm
John Doe v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 1:55 pm
The extent of the director's personal involvement and his state of mind is important. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 11:08 am
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 6:00 am
Most Sami voters live either in Norrbotten or Västerbotten. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 3:34 am
This could complicate matters for companies operating in multiple states and trying to maintain consistent policies. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
Multi-Jurisdictional Relief The Aker v Neptune case provides a practical example of the current multiple forms of relief concurrently available to both patentee and infringer, particularly following new “challenge” procedures introduced by the United States Patent and Trade-mark Office (“USPTO”) last September 2012. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 7:24 am
By Mark S. [read post]
25 May 2012, 4:41 am
By Daniel RichardsonCity of Montpelier v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:23 am
The coastal state does not “own” the claimed area. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 6:02 am
State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 6:02 am
State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 6:02 am
State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm
Billing Fraud: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE WON'T DISMISS MEDICARE FRAUD DEFENDANTS, United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:43 am
MGFB Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 6:54 am
See Vitronics Corp. v. [read post]
