Search for: "Mark S. Goldstein" Results 181 - 200 of 735
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2018, 10:31 am by Mark S. Goldstein and Kelley C. Miller
Among other things – many other things – the president’s tax bill created IRC Section 162(q). [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On September 14, 2012, while hospitalized, plaintiff executed a retainer agreement with defendant Mark L. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 2:10 pm by Stephanie Abbott
Mark Goldstein and Drew Alia, Pennsylvania, and their five Pennsylvania mortgage foreclosure companies were sued today for deceiving consumers into signing contracts to have their mortgage loans modified and never delivering the services paid for. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in this case.] [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in this case.] [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:06 am by Edith Roberts
” At Education Week’s School Law Blog, Mark Walsh reports that Kavanaugh “has argued for allowing students to lead prayers at high school events and supported the inclusion of religious schools in voucher programs. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am by Andrew Hamm
Mark Landler and Maggie Haberman of The New York Times report that “all four of President Trump’s candidates for the Supreme Court are white, middle-aged federal appeals court judges with reliably conservative legal records. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
At Balkinization, Mark Tushnet considers the article about judging by Catholics that was so controversial at Barrett’s confirmation hearings. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
 [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in this case.] [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At Slate, Mark Joseph Stern remarks that the court’s decision last week in Carpenter v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
Mark Walsh has a first-hand account of today’s opinion announcements for this blog. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Mark Walsh
In the center section of the public gallery, Illinois state worker Mark Janus is here, awaiting a decision in Janus v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
At Slate, Mark Joseph Stern suggests that Justice Elena Kagan’s majority opinion in Lucia v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
Mark Walsh has this blog’s opinion analysis. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:30 am by Amy Howe
AFSCME (argued February 26, 2018): This is a case filed by Mark Janus, an Illinois child-support specialist. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
Mark Walsh reports at Education Week’s School Law Blog that the court “declined to take up a … case involving efforts by Indiana to limit teacher-tenure rights. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
”  [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:13 am by Adam Feldman
Similarly, Gibson Dunn’s amicus counsel included Douglas Cox, David Debold, Mark Perry, Ted Olson, Matthew McGill and Theodore Boutrous. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the Associated Press, Mark Sherman reports that a “flood of lawsuits over LGBT rights is making its way through courts and will continue, no matter the outcome in the Supreme Court’s highly anticipated decision in the case of a Colorado baker who would not create a wedding cake for a same-sex couple. [read post]