Search for: "Mark Service"
Results 181 - 200
of 38,212
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2015, 9:17 am
In Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Limited & Anor, the Supreme Court has given judgments that will not be welcomed by the tenant community. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 2:18 am
., finding the marks shown immediately below, for electronic cigarettes, likely to cause confusion with the "exceedingly famous" GUCCI and GUCCI "signature" marks for a wide variety of goods and services, including leather goods, jewelry, and perfume. [read post]
2 Oct 2006, 2:22 pm
So if a mark is well known enough, in theory no one should be able to use that mark or a similar mark for any goods or services. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 1:32 am
However, the line becomes blurred when a mark which is intended to denote a specific trader is one that could also describe or allude to the goods or services in question. [read post]
16 May 2018, 11:03 am
—Whoever intentionally—(1) traffics in goods or services and knowingly uses a counterfeit mark on or in connection with such goods or services [etcetera] ... [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 1:59 am
Section 29(5) deals with infringement of a trade mark when used as a trade name by a business dealing in identical goods/services for which such mark is registered. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 7:31 am
"[N]ot every designation that is used in connection with services necessarily functions as a service mark and not every designation adopted with the intention that it perform a service mark function necessarily does so. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
[TTABlog note: Because yours truly served as co-counsel to Opposer, along with General Counsel Emily LaPointe, this posting will hit just the high points, without editorial commentary.]The Board began by finding that, based on "significant sales, extensive advertising and continuous use of Opposer's marks for almost thirty years for dining services and over two decades on a wide range of merchandise" and on the "ongoing, favorable publicity opposer's… [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:15 am
More importantly, the Champagne Heidsieck[2] principle can be seen as an emanation of what US trade mark lawyers call “nominative use” or “nominative fair use”: one did not use a trade mark as a trade mark by using it to identify the goods or services marked with the trade mark by the trade mark owner. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 12:06 pm
Mark R. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
The IPKat almost forgot to mention that 'The Patents, Trade Marks and Designs (Address for Service) Rules 2009 (SI 2009/546)' have come into force on 6 April 2009. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 9:41 am
In each cases, as we know from Case C‑353/03 Nestlé, it's only necessary to show that, in consequence of such use, the relevant class of persons actually perceives the goods or service, designated exclusively by that mark, as originating from a given undertaking. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 11:00 am
"Applicant's service mark specimenThe law requires that there be "some direct association between the offer of services and the mark sought to be registered. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 1:08 pm
The state-wide Mark S. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 10:23 am
Mark Caruso was recognized by Martindale-Hubbell as an excellent personal injury attorney for his Quality of Service, Overall Value, Responsiveness and Communication Ability. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 8:59 am
“The Gowers Report on Intellectual Property recommended that the UK Intellectual Property Office provide new accelerated services for processing patent and trade mark applications. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 7:01 am
Susan Curry Honored for Longtime Commitment to Public Service qbaron Wed, 07/12/2023 - 09:01 Read more about Susan Curry Honored for Longtime Commitment to Public Service Mark A. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 2:17 pm
The USPTO has issued an Examination Guide for service mark specimens of use: download here. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 7:52 am
Google offers an advertising service called Dynamic Search Ads. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 4:13 am
The EUIPO Opposition Division dismisses the opposition The Opposition Division held that the applicant’s mark was similar for certain goods and services to Beats’ earlier EUTM registrations, and dissimilar for others. [read post]
