Search for: "Mark v. Mark"
Results 181 - 200
of 34,382
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2015, 7:57 am
The IPKat has been informed that a third case is still proceeding at first instance.The Mark 1 decision was about dosage regimes and a composition with specified antibody purity, and the Mark 2 decision about formulations (including the fascinating issue of the construction of product-by-process claims).Now, hot of the press, the IPKat has got his paws on the appeal decision Hospira (UK) Ltd v Genentech, Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 57 (06 February 2015), posted on BAILII as… [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 6:47 am
The Singapore Court of Appeal in Societe Des Produits Nestlé SA and anor v Petra Foods Limited and anor [2016] SGCA 64 recently affirmed a previous High Court decision that Nestlé’s two-finger and four-finger shape marks (the “Shape Marks”) are not registrable. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 2:36 am
Nautica Apparel, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 9:30 pm
South African case law that has referred to European decisions that have caused the UKIPO to summarise the Principles as they have been referred to above include Adcock Ingram v Cipla Medpro (Sabel v Puma), Laugh it off Promotions v SAB (Canon v MGM), Puma v Global Warming (Marca Mode v Adidas) and Cowbell v ICS Holdings (Canon v MGM). [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 6:23 pm
They also love celebrities, soaps operas, staying positive and free speech, which is why Simone Kelly-Brown and OWN Your Power Communications, Inc v Oprah Winfrey et al, No. 12-1207-cv is such a tasty compendium of American tastes and obsessions, with a bit of trade mark law thrown in for good measure. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 6:40 am
" So begins, Carr J's latest trade mark judgment in the English High Court - Pathway IP SARL v Easygroup Ltd [2018] EWHC 3608.This case was a High Court appeal from a successful application by EasyGroup to revoke two trade marks for non-use. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:22 pm
Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lady Justice King and Lords Justices Arnold and Birss) Iconix Luxembourg Holdings SARL v Dream Pairs Europe Inc and another [2024] EWCA Civ 29 (26 Jan 2024)In Trade Marks - Iconix Luxembourg Holdings SARL v Dream Pairs Europe I discussed Mr Justice Miles's judgment in Iconix Luxembourg Holdings SARL v Dream Pairs Europe Inc and another [2023] [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 3:04 am
For practitioners the message was that whilst there may be a grace period for adjustments post-Brexit, it may be wiser to take action now in order to avoid issues such as being unable to service clients, and the rush to meet EUIPO guides that will likely incur high costs.The Keynote: Key Trade Mark Cases of the Last 12 monthsBenet Brandreth QC (11 South Square) gave an enthusiastic review of some of the most interesting Trade Mark cases in the last 12 months; such as Cartier… [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:20 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 6:30 am
Colm Ó Cinnéide, Antagonism v Irritation10. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 8:15 am
[www.supremecourtus.gov] No. 08A8 Title: Mark Dean Schwab, Applicant v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 12:44 pm
Dr Joseph Fesenmair (Bird & Bird, Munich) then gave an explanation of the Court of Justice of the European Union's ruling last year in Case C-487/07 L'Oréal v Bellure. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 11:32 pm
Katfriend Guido Noto La Diega (Northumbria University) looks into issues of registration for olfactory marks at the EU and UK levels.Here’s what Guido writes:“In the UK, whereas in theory olfactory trade marks can be registered, there have not been successful applications since the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Ralf Sieckmann v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 8:57 am
Solo Cup false marking litigation. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 3:28 pm
KDAA v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 12:40 pm
Pequignot v. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 9:40 am
" (Mark 13:8). [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 4:04 am
Cipriani v Cipriani [2008] EWHC 3032 (Ch) established the following principles:is the use in accordance with honest practices (inc. a duty to act fairly re the trade mark owner's interests)? [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 1:01 am
The relevant context, where the mark is a word mark, includes a consideration of the way in which the word has been displayed in relation to the goods and advertisements of which complaint is made: Mars GB Ltd v Cadbury Ltd [1987] RPC 387 at 402, per Whitford J. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 3:06 am
Wise F&I, LLC; Financial Gap, Administrator LLC; Vehicle Service Administrator LLC; and Administration America LLC v. [read post]
