Search for: "Marshall v. Peter"
Results 181 - 200
of 283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2007, 9:00 am
(UK Channel Management Ltd v E! [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:40 pm
Marshals Service, U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
Judges believe that they have argued persuasively for a result, not by correctly marshaling statistical and scientific concepts, but by relying upon precedents erroneously arrived at by other judges in earlier cases. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
This means that schools, libraries, and digital resources must now more than ever equip young people to bridge the distance between the promise and reality of American constitutional democracy.[13] Debate and disagreement relevant to Justice Thurgood Marshall once explained, “A child born to a Black mother in a state like Mississippi... has exactly the same rights as a white baby born to the wealthiest person in the United States. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
IAM/Thomson Reuters survey says: EPO (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Patent plutonomies (IPEG) Mandatory disclosure, PCT and WIPO conspiracy theories (Spicy IP) IP for you business: Reducing patent litigation budgets (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Seeking to sell your patent to a big company? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
IAM/Thomson Reuters survey says: EPO (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Patent plutonomies (IPEG) Mandatory disclosure, PCT and WIPO conspiracy theories (Spicy IP) IP for you business: Reducing patent litigation budgets (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Seeking to sell your patent to a big company? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
IAM/Thomson Reuters survey says: EPO (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Patent plutonomies (IPEG) Mandatory disclosure, PCT and WIPO conspiracy theories (Spicy IP) IP for you business: Reducing patent litigation budgets (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Seeking to sell your patent to a big company? [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(PLI) US Patents Constitutional separation of powers (Patently-O) Patent practitioner ethics update (Patently-O) Interesting claim on Big 3 patents – discussion of Detroit New editorial by James E Malackowski (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Lawyers getting patents: what should the rules be? [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
Co. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 8:06 am
(See pp. 57 & 59 of this interview with Peter Wallison.) [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:38 am
It’s not common at all, though, to see business dissolution proceedings play out in matrimonial court, which is why a recent decision from Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Kathleen Waterman-Marshall is so fascinating. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 7:26 am
Peter Brookes will moderate the discussion. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
, (IMPACT), USPTO launches First Action Interview Pilot Program: (IP Law360), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Patent Baristas), (Patently-O), (Patent Docs), (IP Spotlight), (Anticipate This!) [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:57 am
Ogden : John Marshall, steamboats, and the commerce clause / Herbert A. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:45 am
The head of the Manhattan DA's elder abuse unit said Marshall and lawyer Francis X. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:55 am
And Wells linked to a District Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
The Supreme Court so held in United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 6:27 am
: Field Evidence on the Indirect and Direct Influence of Proxy Advisors Posted by Christie Hayne (University of Illinois) and Marshall D. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:50 am
., Peters v. [read post]
