Search for: "Martin v. Powers" Results 181 - 200 of 1,422
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court gets ready to hear New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm by INFORRM
” Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Nassif v Seven Network [2021] FCA 1286. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 8:57 am by Eugene Volokh
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit heard oral argument in one such case, Gun Owners of America, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 12:41 am by Florence Plisner (Bristows)
Given that the only authorised use of linagliptin is for the purpose specified in the claim (as part of a product containing excipients), this was a powerful factor in determining the circumstances were in place to ensure that linagliptin would be used for that purpose and that Boehringer knew it would be used exclusively for that purpose. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 12:41 am by Florence Plisner (Bristows)
Given that the only authorised use of linagliptin is for the purpose specified in the claim (as part of a product containing excipients), this was a powerful factor in determining the circumstances were in place to ensure that linagliptin would be used for that purpose and that Boehringer knew it would be used exclusively for that purpose. [read post]
These were two of the key questions which the Court of Appeal grappled with in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation The National Union of Journalists has called for a panel of international experts to be convened to investigate the unsolved murder of Sunday World journalist Martin O’Hagan 20 years on. [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 6:39 am by INFORRM
To be a publisher is no longer a position borne of power and privilege, and the lines of defence against inaccuracy that the New York Times v Sullivan precedent relied upon are not as strong as they once were. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
The study was requested by Congress in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2020 Allen v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
The study was requested by Congress in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2020 Allen v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court recently ruled that courts must take separation of powers concerns into account when members of Congress want personal information from the president. [read post]