Search for: "Martinez v. Department of Justice"
Results 181 - 200
of 202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2008, 11:15 pm
The Department of Justice has filed, in the U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:29 pm
A Justice Department statement is here. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 1:50 am
Justice Richter's decision first relied on the ruling earlier this year by the New York Appellate Division, 4th Department, in Martinez v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 23, 2008 US v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Robinson, No. 08-10424 In a case involving the retroactive application of an amendment to the federal sentencing guidelines applying a two-level reduction for all crack offenses, defendant's request for counsel to represent him in his appeal of a motion for reconsideration of an order resentencing defendant without allowing him an attorney is granted where the interests of justice required that counsel be appointed to address the issues to be raised on appeal. . [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 11:21 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 3:32 pm
Department of Justice Manual you can find here. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
GUADALUPE ADRIANA MARTINEZ, BRYAN POWERS, AND LEMUEL LOPEZ; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13-06-00386-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03-08-07)07-0842 VICTOR HADDAD, M.D. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
The following list of the situation in other European countries was provided by the European Court of Human Rights in its decision to reject the UK Government's appeal against the ECHR's judgment in the case of Hirst v the United Kingdom:Prisoners may vote in 16 countries: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina (unless serving a sentence imposed by the International Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia), Cyprus (though they must happen to be out of prison on the day of the elections)… [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 6:58 pm
In Chambers v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
BOTELHO, Petitioners v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Missouri Dep't of Corr., No. 07-1598 In an action raising a retaliation claim under Title VII against plaintiff's employer, a state correctional department, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where, for purposes of a prima facie retaliation case: 1) a single comment at issue in the case was insufficient as a matter of law to support an objectively reasonable belief it amounted to unlawful sexual harassment; and 2) under the facts of the case, no reasonable person coul [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:56 pm
Justice McNamara cited Martinez v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 3:38 pm
Martinez v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 3:25 pm
Justice Harold L. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, January 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
According to one press report, Angel Diaz "appeared to be moving 24 minutes after the first injection, grimacing, blinking, licking his lips, blowing and appearing to mouth words". [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 4:23 am
Martinez, where three justices of the Court opined that interrogating a suspect under extreme pain or fear doesn't shock the conscience if the police had a good reason, doesn't go as far - because, after all, three justices are only three justices. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 11:13 am
The preview of Gilles v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Martinez
• People v. [read post]
