Search for: "Matter of Briggs" Results 181 - 200 of 271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Following a report by the Civil Justice Council in 2015 and recommendations by Lord Justice Briggs in 2016, the Bill would introduce a new digital procedure governed by a new set of rules distinct from current court processes. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 4:41 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In relation to the tort gateway issue, Lord Lloyd-Jones (with whom Lord Reed, Lord Briggs, and Lord Burrows agree) gave the lead judgment. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:08 am by CMS
Third, it was highlighted that the Supreme Court is not best placed to deal with procedural matters. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am by CMS
Please refresh the UKSC Blog homepage throughout the day in order to get the latest posts. 1426: As we bring this Live Blog to a close, we all eagerly await the UK Supreme Court’s judgment in this important matter. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 12:32 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Suffice it to say that, as a matter of empirical observation, the range of amounts claimed is broad. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:29 pm
Jeremy gives the floor to Nick Briggs and Kerry Russell (Shakespeares), who report on 118 Data Resource Limited v IDS Data Services Limited and others [2014] EWHC 3629 (Ch), a High Court, England and Wales, ruling of Deputy Judge David Halpern QC, in which they represented the defendants. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:43 am by CMS
In finding this, the Inner House placed weight on the need for such claims to be similar in subject matter; noting that it was logical for domestic law to adopt different types of procedure for different categories of claim. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 1:21 pm by familoo
Zoe is a barrister at St John’s Chambers, who specialises in financial matters after a relationship ends. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am by Kelly
Knight (EPLAW) (IPKat) INTA special reports: Sir Robin Jacob’s speech; a century of trade mark law; damages in Europe (IPKat) (IPKat) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform What Congress should do to fix the patent system, step 1 (Patenthink) Patent Reform Update: Summer debate ahead for America Invents Act (Patent Law Practice Center) How Article One relates to patent quality and reform (Patent Quality Matters) US Patents USPTO expands first action interview pilot program (inovia)… [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:21 pm by Lyle Denniston
   In turn, one of the lawyers for the detainees, New York attorney Rebecca Briggs, contended that “these limitations [on counsel's access] that are being added in footnotes [in government access rules] just highlight the fact that their assurances to yield their discretion responsibly cannot be taken at face value, unfortunately.” There is a core legal dispute between the two sides, apart from their mutual suspicions about each other’s motives. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 4:38 pm by Maria Hook
Lawrence Collins LJ (as he then was) described it as “a very serious matter for the English court to grant an injunction to restrain enforcement in a foreign country of a judgment of a court of that country” (Masri v Consolidated Contractors International (UK) Ltd (No. 3) [2008] EWCA Civ 625, [2009] QB 503 at [93]). [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 2:31 pm by David Strifling
Briggs, 229 U.S. 82, 88 (1913)). [4] United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Simon Fodden
These have been subsumed — and elaborated up the ladder — in the Myers-Briggs copyrighted world of psychological testing; but I still prefer the original, simpler analysis (particularly as expounded by Daryl Sharp). [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 7:34 am by ASAD KHAN
The Supreme Court Generally speaking, Lord Carnwath – with whom Lords Kerr, Wilson, Reed and Briggs concurred – held that Part 5A deliberately establishes an uncomplicated set of rules. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:34 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
As a matter of language, hiring a domestic worker is capable of being described as exercising a “commercial activity”. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:11 am by CMS
Lord Briggs gave a separate concurring judgment, agreeing that the no oral modification clause prevented the variation in this case from being valid. [read post]