Search for: "Matter of Cruz v Cruz"
Results 181 - 200
of 392
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2013, 10:32 am
Rial v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 10:55 am
Case citation: Palmer v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 3:10 am
The litigation in which the man's estate was the defendant, was characterized as "entrenched and highly adversarial" on all issues.The trial judge decided as follows: The judge determined as a matter of law that N.J.S.A. 25:1-5(h) applied prospectively in this case for the following reasons: (1) language in the law that "[t]his act shall take effect immediately" indicated a legislative intent that its application be prospective; (2) our courts have… [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:33 am
Scheidegger contends that, [a]s a policy matter,” the practice “is certainly debatable. [read post]
17 May 2021, 8:31 am
Cruz Santana, No. 03-CV-6299, 2005 WL 67094, at *2-4, 7, 11-12 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 2:38 am
In sum, the plaintiffs version of the events was "manifestly untrue, physically impossible, or contrary to common experience, and such testimony should be disregarded as being without evidentiary value" (Cruz v New York City Tr. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:50 pm
In People v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:50 pm
In People v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:40 pm
Attorney Rodríguez-Vélez. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:03 pm
HERNANDEZ, PEDRO JOSE MARTINEZ, WILLIAMS ARIELLO GALANTINO, JOSE DE LA CRUZ CARDENAS, on their own behalf and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Matter of DeNigris v Smithtown Cent. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Matter of DeNigris v Smithtown Cent. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 2:06 am
the answer to question 2 of the CJEU reference made last week in Vereniging van Openbare Bibliotheken (VOB) v Stichting Leenrecht answers the exhaustion question in such a way that it is also applicable here.Thanks so much 'Pacta' for this helpful insight! [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:39 am
On July 23, 2013, however, in a published opinion, Federated University Police Officers Association v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 5:00 am
Cruz-Ramirez, No. 2015-CV-234 CV (C.P. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 6:05 am
Santa Cruz Women Against Rape (Cal. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 4:04 pm
Billed in the English version of the Curia website as an exciting ruling on "Agriculture and fisheries", it would have been ignored altogether were it not for a well-aimed email from scholar, Katfriend and fellow blogger Martin Husovec, who told him what it was really about.Thursday 13/02/201409:30JudgmentC-31/13 PAgriculture and fisheriesHungary v CommissionCourt of Justice - Third ChamberHUCourtroom I - Level 8The text is not available in EnglishAdvocate General : Cruz… [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
When you read the complete text of Hamilton v. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am
Readers might for instance recall the recent judgment in Sekmadienis Ltd v Lithuania [Katpost here], in which the ECtHR considered that a prohibition to use in advertising the image of Jesus and Mary on grounds of public morals should be regarded as an undue compression of the applicants' own freedom of expression under Article 10 ECHR. [read post]
