Search for: "Matter of Jonathan H."
Results 181 - 200
of 856
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2021, 6:51 am
So if the House does refer the matter to DOJ, prosecutors are likely to bring it before a grand jury. . . . [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 7:40 am
Leiter’s own take on the matter can be found here. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 7:56 pm
Alas, Jonathan Star Bristol failed to shine once at Winston. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 6:30 am
No matter. [read post]
24 May 2018, 5:00 am
A statement released by the court reads: Chief Judge Garland announced today that the Court has voted to live stream audio of all oral arguments, except when classified or sealed matters must be discussed. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 2:10 pm
Were agencies exercising authority recently delegated authority, one could argue that such delegations reflect a contemporary judgment of the desirability of delegating broad authority to a particular agency to address a particular concern, perhaps due to the technical complexity of the underlying subject matter. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 7:23 am
Update 1: Oy, it just gets worse (again Jonathan H. [read post]
27 May 2015, 7:06 am
Does any of this matter? [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 9:36 am
In many cases, the subject matter and methodology of conservative scholarship is simply of no interest to those on the left (and probably vice-versa). [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 10:53 am
"--Jonathan Rowe, First Things "[James H. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 8:50 am
[No matter how the Supreme Court rules in West Virginia v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 7:21 am
The court denied the motion on the ground that the matter had been continued by agreement of the parties. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 6:40 pm
What matters is what Congress did -- and what Congress did is create a law that regulates health insurance markets and lacks an enforceable mandate to purchase insurance. [read post]
13 May 2017, 11:48 am
But let’s assume the 16th Amendment does matter. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 10:34 am
Rather, the ambiguity must concern a matter delegated to the agency to resolve. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:10 am
(Jonathan H. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 5:17 pm
(Jonathan H. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 5:44 am
Jonathan H. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 5:18 am
The Court finds the intent of Congress is clear, so that is the end of the matter; “for the court, as well as the agency, must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 12:47 pm
Its a matter of explaining yourself and focusing public attention--in short, a matter of leadership. [read post]
