Search for: "Matter of Jonathan M." Results 181 - 200 of 1,120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2013, 2:44 pm by Lou M
It's hard to imagine a personnel matter as significant to the NFL as Bountygate being managed as badly as it was. [read post]
1 May 2014, 5:26 pm
 It was a significant mistake, and one I’m quite surprised no one on the Court caught before the opinion was released. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 5:20 pm by Adrian Lurssen
The list reflects no more or less than what grabs my attention today, and yes I'm using "legal marketing" in a broad sense. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 3:59 am by SHG
It’s the hated speech that requires us to stand up for it, no matter how much we despise it. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 10:44 am by Duncan Hollis
I wanted to flag a fascinating debate over the future of the Internet that just occurred between HLS Professor Jonathan Zittrain and Stewart Baker. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 5:39 am by Eugene Volokh
(I have seen that happen on some occasions, though my sense is that Google has recently become very careful about such matters.) [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 7:51 pm by charonqc
As Gideon says… “Instead, read the Review as a free flowing conversation I’m having with myself (and you). [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
During my recent visit to Columbia Law School, Professor John Coffee shared with me a draft of a short article that later appeared in the New York Law Journal.[1] Coffee’s article assessed the prospects in the U.S. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The First FOIL Request On February 18, 2015, petitioner Grace Rauh, a reporter at NY1 News, submitted a FOIL request to respondent Office of the Mayor of the City of New York(the Office of the Mayor) seeking "copies of correspondence that Mayor de Blasio and/or senior members of his administration conducted with Jonathan Rosen in the [M]ayor's first year in office. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:48 pm by Aaron Nielson
It is the second post we are publishing today; see also this related post from Jonathan M. [read post]
9 May 2009, 5:02 pm
Cl. 121 (1994), Andrea Cassman’s son, Jonathan, was born in July 1992, but Andrea and her husband tried to take a dependency exemption for Jonathan in 1991, because, they argued, Jonathan was a “dependent” for exemption purposes from the moment of his conception. [read post]