Search for: "Matter of Martin v City of New York"
Results 181 - 200
of 223
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
– EPA News Release, March 26, 2010 U.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:20 am
Both sought to arbitrate whether their terminations constituted disciplinary actions.Citing Matter of Felix v New York City Dept. of Citywide Admin. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:27 pm
Inability to demonstrate the possession of a required license permits the summary termination of an incumbentMatter of Cravatta v New York State Dept. of Transp., 23 Misc 3d 1137(A)In this case the court considered the application of the so-called "Felix" procedure [Felix v New York City Dep't of Citywide Administrative Services, 3 NY3d 498] in a situation where the incumbent loses or fails to renew a license required to… [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 7:12 am
For Stephen Klein, 43, a renter, a single father and a librarian at the City University of New York, the process of moving is “very emotional. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 6:06 am
”*** In contrast, see Matter of Martin ex rel Lekkas, 86 AD2d 712. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 4:38 am
In Martin v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:26 am
Provided that defendant attorneys were not discharged for cause, in which case they would not be entitled to any fee (see Matter of Montgomery, 272 NY 323, 326 [1936]), their recovery would be limited to the fair and reasonable value of their services, computed on the basis of quantum meruit (see Matter of Cohen v Grainger, Tesoriero & Bell, 81 NY2d 655, 658 [1993]; Lai Ling Cheng v Modansky Leasing Co., 73 NY2d 454, 457-458 [1989]; Schneider, Kleinick,… [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Partnership for New York City, Inc., amicus curiae. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Methuen, MA; Albert Martin, President) Alex Truck, Inc. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 4:10 am
Inability to demonstrate the possession of a required license permits the summary termination of an incumbentMatter of Cravatta v New York State Dept. of Transp., 2009 NY Slip Op 51164(U), Decided on May 15, 2009, Supreme Court, Erie County, Judge Paula L. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
John's University School of Law and New York Law School, commented: "... [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
Martin v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 7:39 am
Bartholomew's Church, 56 NY2d 71, 76 (1982); Martin v City of Cohoes, 37 NY2d 162, 165 (1975); Matter of New York, Lackawanna & Western R. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 12:33 am
City of New York, it addressed what constitutes adequate notice of a sidewalk defect for purposes of what has become commonly known as the 'Pothole Law'; and in Matter of Rivera v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
o SCOTUS docket hereRicci v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
E.g., Martin v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Palm Beach City, 361 So. 2d 135, 137 n.7 (1978). [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 6:12 am
City of New York, 182 A.D.2d 469, Matter of Caruso v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 7:30 pm
His attorney told the New York Law Journal that Taylor will seek permission to appeal. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 12:38 am
Citing Matter of New York City Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
