Search for: "Matter of McCoy v McCoy"
Results 181 - 194
of 194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2008, 3:47 pm
And in McCoy v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 12:00 am
This could create yet another conflict with McCoy v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 9:10 pm
We've just been informed of a California appellate decision, Conte v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 12:30 pm
Bennett v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 11:30 am
Procter & Gamble v HMRC [2008] EWHC 1558 (Ch) (Warren J) (Thanks to the Legal Post for highlighting this case). [read post]
2 May 2008, 10:20 am
* Perry Homes v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 4:44 am
In support of their respective motions pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5), each of the defendants demonstrated, prima facie, that the time in which to sue had expired and that the complaint was time-barred as against them (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 785 N.E.2d 714, 755 N.Y.S.2d 693; Sabadie v Burke, 47 AD3d 913, 849 N.Y.S.2d 440; Matter of Schwartz, 44 AD3d 779, 843 N.Y.S.2d 403; Savarese v Shatz, 273 AD2d 219, 708 N.Y.S.2d 642; CPLR 214[6]). [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:52 pm
Angela Shapiro McCoy, Appellant v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 4:13 pm
McCoy managed to annoy the court in under 20 seconds ??? [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 3:37 am
In Papa John's International, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 3:12 pm
And -- to make matters worse -- the first paragraph ends with the following: "It bears emphasis we are only addressing a felony sentence imposed in Los Angeles County. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 8:47 am
" Defendant's husband showed McCoy defendant's purse, which he had found in the residence. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 3:33 am
McCoy Rests., Inc., 708 F.2d 582, 585 (5th Cir.1983) [internal quotations omitted]. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 9:58 am
Anthony McCoy v. [read post]
