Search for: "Matter of McNeil v McNeil" Results 181 - 184 of 184
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
The "it," of course, is negligence per se based upon claims that the defendant somehow violated the Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act ("FDCA").Pull up a cyberchair and pay attention because we're going to explain some ways of defeating such claims - as a matter of law - that you probably haven't considered.First, a little bit on why FDCA-based negligence per se is so dangerous and difficult a cause of action to deal with. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 2:31 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual Property 'Pepcid Complete' Patent Holders Denied Judgment On 'Best Mode' to Prepare Acid Inhibitor's Granules McNeil-PPC Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 6:02 pm
Westendorp v the Queen (1983) Reference Re Nova Scotia Board of Censors v McNeil (1978) Rio Hotel Ltd v New Brunswick (Liquor licensing board) (1987) Switzman v Elbling (1957) Bedard v Dawson (1923) Reference re Alberta Legislation (1938), aka Alberta Press Act Reference Download Standard Podcast [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 9:43 am
In Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical v. [read post]