Search for: "Matter of Mendoza"
Results 181 - 195
of 195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2020, 6:47 am
Here, even in the light most favorable to the defendant, the evidence did not establish an objective reasonable belief of death or serious harm as a matter of law. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Missouri Dep't of Corr., No. 07-1598 In an action raising a retaliation claim under Title VII against plaintiff's employer, a state correctional department, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where, for purposes of a prima facie retaliation case: 1) a single comment at issue in the case was insufficient as a matter of law to support an objectively reasonable belief it amounted to unlawful sexual harassment; and 2) under the facts of the case, no reasonable person coul [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 11:46 am
This is and always has been simply a matter of statutory interpretation:If, as the government argues, Congress has conferred upon the Secretary the discretion to defer removal of these aliens – and to authorize employers to hire those aliens, see 8 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 10:07 am
Can Oceanic claim issue preclusion against Kate on the matter of the airline’s negligence? [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 11:57 pm
House of Representatives Captain Carneysha Mendoza (Testimony) Field Commander Special Operations Division United States Capitol Police (USCP) House Energy & Commerce Committee (February 24, 2021) House Energy… [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, October 15, 2008 Mendoza v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:16 pm
Lopez-Mendoza, 468 U.S. 1032,1044-45 (1984). [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm
The ISS SCAS authors are Jeffrey Lubitz, Managing Director, and Elisa Mendoza, Esq., Associate Director. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
No. 01-729 November 13, 2002 The above-entitled matter came on for oral argument before the Supreme Court of the United States at 10:04 a.m. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 3:00 am
National/Federal Court Debates Using Shell Companies to Mask Political Donations Bloomberg Law – Kenneth Doyle | Published: 1/10/2020 A federal appeals court panel heard arguments over the use of shell companies to hide donations in a case that could affect super PAC disclosure in the 2020 election. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Genao-Sanchez, No. 05-1402 Sentence for drug conspiracy, conspiring to use a firearm in furtherance of a drug conspiracy, and aiding and abetting the commission of a crime, is vacated and remanded where: 1) the district court's failure to convene a new sentencing hearing deprived defendant the opportunity to argue his position both as to matters of fact relevant to sentencing, and as to the appropriate sentence to be imposed; and 2) thus, the error was prejudicial. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 6:59 pm
Span Enterprises v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
We're talking about the Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §2, to be precise. [read post]
