Search for: "Matter of Nixon C." Results 181 - 200 of 260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2008, 10:55 am
But so little is written about it except with regard to national security matters that our law school was unable to put together a conference dealing with its vast but unacknowledged breadth and consequences. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf and Neil H. Buchanan
In this column, we explain why a President must—as a matter of constitutional imperative—choose to issue debt in excess of the statutory limit, if the budget otherwise requires him to do so. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 6:00 am by Charlotte Butash
The district court granted the committee’s motion for summary judgment, holding that it had subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 7:27 am by David Super
  A forged deed or contract is literally not worth the paper it is written on:  no matter how much a third party relies on such a deed, it has no legal effect. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 5:35 am by Benjamin Schwartz
” Early drafts of the Constitution originally provided only that the president “may” recommend “matters” to Congress. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:01 am by Peter Neal
But the historian’s allegation, as well as her inflammatory analogization of this purported abuse to the since-disbanded Special Services Staff, a secretive IRS unit that was notoriously associated with the Nixon administration’s politicization of government agencies, was influential. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 6:57 am
State, 469 N.E.2d 1153, 1157 (Indiana Supreme Court 1984) (referencing Nixon v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Roosevelt, Nixon, Ford, Clinton and Obama. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 5:01 am by Daniel J. Hemel
Trump should have released his returns voluntarily—as every elected president since Richard Nixon has. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
Lloyd Hitoshi Mayer, a law professor at Notre Dame, said a 501(c)(3) charity cannot benefit one person. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  One may wonder whether Hamilton was sincere, but it really doesn’t matter. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:32 am by Paul Smith and Adav Noti
To be sure, the unbinding of the electors is unlikely to matter if the result of the presidential election is one-sided. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 3:27 am
Unfortunately, on this issue, more than any other, the new President faces only unattractive choices.President Obama will be tempted to play the Nixon-to-China card. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:58 am by NCC Staff
And for the past two hundred and twenty years, pretty much as a de facto matter, we’ve had broad presidential removal powers. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Ronald Collins
  Question: On October 14, 1971, there was an unsigned piece in the New York Times on potential Supreme Court nominees Nixon was then considering. [read post]