Search for: "Matter of Singh v Singh" Results 181 - 200 of 512
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2020, 5:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Further, the trust beneficiaries have no standing to sue regarding property that was in the trusts (see Matter of Larchmont Pancake House v Board of Assessors and/or Assessors of the Town of Mamaroneck, 33 NY3d 228, 240 [2019]; Buechel v Bain, 275 AD2d 65, 65 [1st Dept 2000]). [read post]
9 Jan 2022, 1:45 am by Rose Hughes
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a revolutionary form of immunotherapy in which a patient's own T cells are reprogrammed to target harmful (e.g. cancer) cells (Singh et al.). [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 10:29 pm
The Constitution Bench judgment of this Court in Bachan Singh has been summarised in para 38 in Machhi Singh v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:47 am by Kali Borkoski
Thanks to Tejinder Singh for the additional analysis in today’s Details. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
The courts have traditionally been wary of allowing litigation to become an ancillary arena for the determination of the factual foundation for controversial topics (see the decision in British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350). [read post]
Chandrachud was one of the presiding judges in the five-judge bench that unanimously invalidated a part of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860  (‘IPC’) which had criminalised homosexuality in India, in the landmark case of Navtej Singh Johar & Others v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm by Carl Shusterman
Garland (5-24-23) Matter of Fernandes – BIA (4-2-22) Deciphering Matter of Fernandes (12-5-22) Singh v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:03 am
Johns Law School and New York Law School, All rights reserved.Matter of Wells v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 8:47 am by The Legal Blog
Ajai Pal Singh and Others [(1989) 2 SCC 116].A distinction is also made between performance of a statutory duty and/or dealing of a public matter by a State and its commercial activities. [read post]
12 May 2008, 12:51 pm
Because the record shows that such an increase in commuting time is de minimis as a matter of law, we AFFIRM the district court's judgment that none of the plaintiffs' commuting time is compensable under the FLSA....In the commuting context, we believe that the appropriate application of the predominant benefit test is whether an employer's restrictions hinder the employees' ability to use their commuting time as they otherwise would have had there been no work-related… [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:21 am by The Legal Blog
 Retired Army Chief General V P Malik, Lieutenant General Vijay Oberoi (retired Vice Chief of Army Staff) and a civil servant to be appointed by the Centre would be the members. [read post]