Search for: "Matter of Small v State of New York" Results 181 - 200 of 1,504
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Ted Folkman
Article V of the New York Convention does not list “manifest disregard of law, ” as the American cases call it, as grounds for refusal of recognition or enforcement. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Ted Folkman
Article V of the New York Convention does not list “manifest disregard of law, ” as the American cases call it, as grounds for refusal of recognition or enforcement. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
To put it more concretely, Vermont residents could sue the New York source only under New York law. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 12:22 pm by Mark Ashton
Two years later, under the pretense of attending a wedding, Golan flew to the United States with the child and moved into a shelter in New York. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Retromark Volume V: the last six months in trade marks1. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
New York Times, April 16, 1873 In 1874, the White League staged an uprising in New Orleans (then the capital of Louisiana) to seize control of the state government. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:13 am by SHG
As noted in the New York Law Journal, the Court of Appeals, by Judge Robert Smith, granted leave in People v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The claim in the case was that instead of paying Goel and eSys for the shares, Teledata “repeatedly diverted small amounts of money that it had deposited into the Rainforest bank account” to two of teh defendants, Bunge Ltd. and Bunge S.A., and to companies controlled by the other defendant, Anush Ramachandran, a resident of New York and an officer of Teledata.Goel and eSys sued Ramachandran and Bunge in the New York Supreme Court, alleging… [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:57 am by Joel R. Brandes
It was inappropriate for plaintiff to attempt to avoid Israel's legal system because New York's legal system may treat her more favorably by permitting her to obtain a no fault divorce. [read post]