Search for: "Matter of T S B" Results 181 - 200 of 19,490
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2018, 2:40 pm
Si la cour rejette la requête, la partie peut la renouveler après jugement (Règle 50(b)). [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 1:33 pm by Daniel Nathan
The SEC also found violations of the antifraud provisions, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5(b) promulgated thereunder, arising from materially false and misleading statements found on Tomahawk’s ICO website and in its white paper. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:36 am by Diane Tweedlie
An opposition had been filed against the patent, based on the grounds of Article 100(b) and of Article 100(a) EPC together with both Articles 54 and 56 EPC.The opposition against the patent was rejected by the opposition division which considered the subject-matter of the claims as granted to fulfil the requirements of Article 54 and 83 EPC. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This very long – 123 pages – decision contains lots of interesting procedural aspects (it’s one of those decisions where the appellants are desperate enough to invoke Article 6 of the Human Rights Convention, which is never a good sign) and is well worth skimming through. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 3:55 pm by admin
Uh, but under 12(b)(6), doesn’t the court need to construe Trinity’s assertion that it held valid US patents as fact? [read post]
6 May 2009, 6:23 pm
I really appreciate Gordon's comment to my second post. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
A process for removing nitrogen oxides from flue gas issuing from a regenerator of a fluidized catalytic cracking unit wherein the flue gas is cleaned of substantial amounts of dust in the regenerator, the process comprising the steps of:a) directing the flue gas into a tertiary cyclone separator and separating the solids therefrom so that not more than 250mg/Nm3 of solids exit in an overflow from the tertiary cyclone separator and causing between 0.5% and 6% percentage of flue gas entering the… [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In substance, D2 discloses the examples A, B and C. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:27 am by Greg Daugherty
Legendary UCLA Men’s Basketball Coach John Wooden once asked, “If you don’t have time to do it right, when will you have time to do it over? [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:28 am by Jessica Kroeze
It also raised objections under Article 123(2) EPC and for lack of novelty against the auxiliary request.It attached to its letter the following new item of evidence:D35: Copy of the Mr T B van Aken's publicly available entry in the "Linkedin" database.XI. [read post]
11 May 2021, 8:54 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The opponent's case, where relevant to the present decision, may be summarised as follows.Main request- Novelty in view of D1- Example 1 was prejudicial to the novelty of claim 1 of the main request. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 8:28 am by Matt Osenga
  In addressing this issue, the Court recognized that there may be some overlap between § 101 and § 102, but this won’t always be the case. [read post]
3 May 2013, 4:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  So the fact that Hargis couldn’t overcome B&Bs challenge to the registration didn’t mean that B&B could meet its burden of persuasion on infringement. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:50 am by Simon Lester
Law prof Jelena Bäumler offers the following thoughts on yesterday's decision by the German Federal Constitutional Court on CETA: Yes, but…- for now! [read post]
10 May 2014, 9:05 am by Daniel Shaviro
While in a B&B on a short overnight family-related roadtrip, I started reading a copy of Evelyn Waugh's Brideshead Revisited that they had in the room,  (I'm a big Waugh fan, but tend to prefer the snark, or for that matter the harrowing Ordeal of Gilbert Penfold, to the mellow mists of memory.) [read post]