Search for: "May v. Hoffman" Results 181 - 200 of 807
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2018, 3:58 am
Actavis v Lilly demonstrates there may be room to consider the file history, and by extension, evidence from the patentee. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Schwartz, No. 05-4978 In the context of plea agreements and criminal sentencing, the government may withdraw a downward departure motion when a defendant agrees not to violate the law and a written plea agreement reserves to the government the right to withdraw the motion upon that occurrence. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am by ELLIOT GOLD
An ordinary and reasonable member of the public may consider that not to reach the level of dishonesty whereas a reasonable police officer may consider that it does. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 7:48 pm
Hoffman's analysis follows along with his translation of the relevant portions of the opinion. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 4:40 am
With one qualification that we will discuss below, the Supreme Court now appears to have clarified that this is the case, in Dozco India v Doosan, decided on 5 October, 2010. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:30 am by Kevin Couch
As an example of that trend, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania recently authored an opinion illustrating the unique nature of our system.In Hoffman v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:00 am by Paula Bremner
It has been 15 years since the last brand v brand challenge of a biologic patent in Canada. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:33 pm by Eric Goldman
Barnes & Noble * Court Disregards Check-the-Box Agreement and Doesn’t Enforce Venue Clause — Dunstan v. comScore * Forum Selection Clause in “Submerged” Terms of Service Presumptively Unenforceable — Hoffman v. [read post]