Search for: "Mays v. Burgess"
Results 181 - 200
of 215
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2015, 10:32 am
The first standard applied, the Cronic standard (from the SCOTUS ruling in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:17 am
Zinke, … their important amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 4:35 am
At Buzzfeed, Chris Geidner notes that the court may soon decide whether to review the transgender rights case Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:37 pm
But others may take a different view. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:28 am
” For Politico, Burgess Everett and Elana Schor report that “Kavanaugh’s nomination is already a huge headache for … Senate minority leader” Chuck Schumer of New York. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:23 am
” At In These Times, James Gray Pope and others look at approaches to “rebuilding labor after the Supreme Court’s … ruling” in Janus v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:14 pm
It’s been a long two years since the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 10:40 pm
In Burgess v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 10:39 am
., v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:09 am
" Burgess v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
(In some cases, like United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 7:02 am
One example is the May 10 settlement between the U.S. and the University of Miami (UM), which agreed to pay $22 million to resolve allegations that it “routinely ordered medically unnecessary laboratory tests and used misleading billing practices to increase their reimbursement from Medicare,” a WNN article states. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:59 am
In a CNN interview after Justice Anthony Kennedy’s retirement, Collins told Jake Tapper that she “would not support a nominee who demonstrated hostility to Roe v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:05 am
See Konop v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 2:52 pm
See Lewis v. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 12:59 am
Kaya Burgess of The Times comments further here: Secret ballots scrapped in new plan to select bishops, and the Church Mouse comments here: Proposals for reform of episcopal appointments to be debated. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:50 am
The Supreme Court can, like previously the House of Lords, depart from precedent in line with the Practice Statement [1966] 1 WLR 1234 (see Austin v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Southwark [2010] UKSC 28, at [25]), but the Supreme Court is very hesitant to do so in order to maintain legal certainty and predictability. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 10:58 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm
Financially responsible though it may have been, the decision backfired badly. [read post]
