Search for: "Mays v. Social Security Administration"
Results 181 - 200
of 2,252
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2016, 11:20 am
The SSDI program is administered by the United States Social Security Administration (SSA). [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division initially observed that an applicant for disability retirement benefits bears the burden of establishing that his disability arose from an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law [RSSL], and the Comptroller's determination in this regard will be upheld if supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division initially observed that an applicant for disability retirement benefits bears the burden of establishing that his disability arose from an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law [RSSL], and the Comptroller's determination in this regard will be upheld if supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 4:06 pm
Cal. 2010), the court held that evidence of an award of Social Security disability benefits was necessary for an adequate de novo review of the plan administrator’s determination, where the Social Security decision was rendered six months after the denial of the claimant’s final administrative appeal in the ERISA matter. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
Schmitt, et al. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:10 pm
Steve Schaeffer, Assistant Inspector General for the Office of Audit, Social Security Administration Office of the Inspector General, Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Social Security of the House Committee on Ways and Means, June 7, 2007; http://waysandmeans.house.gov/hearings.asp? [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:54 am
Supreme Court dismissed the petition on the ground that the police officers failed to exhaust their administrative remedies.The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court’s ruling, pointing out “It is hornbook law that one who objects to the act of an administrative agency must exhaust available administrative remedies before being permitted to litigate in a court of law," citing Watergate II Apts. v Buffalo Sewer Auth., 46 NY2d 52.Here, said the… [read post]
13 May 2013, 6:48 pm
Secretary of the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 10:14 am
West v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:32 pm
With no standing to challenge suspicionless surveillance that ensnares national security journalists thanks to the Supreme Court’s Clapper v. [read post]
Spoiling for a Fight: Why the Administration’s Loss Last Night May Be Not Just Expected But Welcomed
2 Mar 2025, 7:49 am
The reason may be Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 1:05 pm
This decision aligns Medicaid eligibility to the position that the Social Security Administration has taken with regard to maintaining SSI eligibility from the very first rules that come out in 1999. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 1:05 pm
This decision aligns Medicaid eligibility to the position that the Social Security Administration has taken with regard to maintaining SSI eligibility from the very first rules that come out in 1999. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:05 pm
This decision aligns Medicaid eligibility to the position that the Social Security Administration has taken with regard to maintaining SSI eligibility from the very first rules that come out in 1999. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:10 am
Regardless of the type of benefits applied for, you submit the application to the United States Social Security Administration (SSA), as that is the federal governmental organization responsible for administering the Social Security disability programs. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:28 am
Civil Monetary Penalties (CMP): Congress enacted the CMP law (outlined under Section 1128A of the Social Security Act) as one of several administrative remedies to combat Medicare and Medicaid fraud and abuse. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:44 am
Commissioner of Social Security In Biestek v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 4:29 pm
In early 2012, a legal challenge arose - Hall v Sebelius - over this double-secret Social Security rule. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
” Smith v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 5:11 am
Jarkesy On June 27, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
