Search for: "McCoy v. McCoy" Results 181 - 200 of 616
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2018, 12:42 pm by Jaclyn Belczyk
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] 6-3 Monday in McCoy v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 8:15 am by Kent Scheidegger
There are four criminal law decisions from the United States Supreme Court this morning:In McCoy v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 7:03 am by Howard Bashman
Justice Ginsburg delivered the opinion of the Court in McCoy v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am by John Elwood
Jackson, 17-651, McCoy v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Defendant established its entitlement to dismissal on statute of limitation grounds by submitting evidence that the malpractice occurred in 2008, but plaintiff did not commence this action until March 2016, well beyond the three-year limitation period for legal malpractice (CPLR 214[6]; see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002]; Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 541 [1994]; Glamm v Allen, 57 NY2d 87, 93 [1982]). [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Various other claims were dismissed.In McCoy v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
More specifically, the continuous representation doctrine “applies only where there is ‘a mutual understanding of the need for further representation on the specific subject matter underlying the malpractice claim’ ” (Rodeo Family Enters., LLC v Matte, 99 AD3d at 784, quoting McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 306 [2002]). [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
What is important is when the malpractice was committed, not when the client discovered it” (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301, 755 NYS2d 693 [2002]). [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In opposition, plaintiffs argue that the continuous representation doctrine applies to· Todtman Nachamie (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 306 [2002]). [read post]